Reading Twitter, some people are turned off by the modern approach to Emma 2009. Curious minds want to know what you thought of the first installment of this new Jane Austen novel adaptation with Romola Garai, Jonny Lee Miller and Michael Gambon. These are your choices: a yawner, meh, loved it, and will have to wait and see. If you would like to share your thoughts, please leave a comment. Do you love the new film? Do you like it? Or are you sitting on the fence, waiting to see how the series will develop? Here’s my review of the film.
Emma 2009 Poll: What did you think of Part One?
October 4, 2009 by Vic
27 Responses
Items of Interest
Black London by Gretchen Gerzina
Free E-Book: Gerzina has written a fascinating account of London blacks, focusing on the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Because of a paucity of sources from blacks themselves, Gerzina had to rely primarily on glimpses through white eyes, especially those of antislavery advocate Granville Sharp. Gerzina is quite adept at culling evidence of a rich, complex black life, with significant interaction (and intermarriage) with the white community. Although subjected to much discrimination, London blacks never suffered as much as their American counterparts. The author rightly concludes that blacks have played an important role in the life of London for much of its history.
Click on this link to Dartmouth.edu.
And
Perfect for Easter: Rachel Dodge's The Little Women Devotional, published March 2022.
This book has a devotional entry for every chapter of Little Women by Louisa May Alcott. You can read a chapter of Little Women and then read the corresponding devotional entry, going through the book one chapter at a time.
Note: Rachel Dodge is a monthly contributor to this blog.
- Follow Jane Austen's World on WordPress.com
Blog Stats
- 15,996,144 hits
-
Highly Recommended a New Book! Bath -An Adumbration in Rhyme
-
Edited by Ben Wiebracht. Read the review of the book at this link. Click to order the book on Amazon US or Amazon UK
In Sri Lanka lies the grave of Rear Admiral Charles Austen CB, Jane Austen’s Brother
The neglected tombstone found in an overgrown burial ground.
Rear Admiral Charles Austen CB
Died off Prome, the 7th October 1852, while in command of the Naval Expedition on the river Irrawady against the Burmese Forces, aged 73 years.”
The grave after restoration
Read the full article in The Sunday Times. June 27, 2021.
The Obituary of Charlotte Collins by Andrew Capes
Click on image to read the story.
Comments
“My idea of good company…is the company of clever, well-informed people, who have a great deal of conversation.” – Jane Austen, Persuasion
Gentle readers: Please feel free to post your comments and continue the conversation! Due to SPAM, we will no longer accept comments on posts after 30 days of publication. In some instances, links will be removed from comments as well.
Administrators and Contributors
Pin It!
Top Posts
-
-
Recent Posts
Links to Jane Austen Blogs
Find Jane Austen on Google
May we suggest?
Regent’s Canal Walk (Little Venice to Kings Cross): Tony Grant
Take a walk along a portion of Regent’s Canal with Tony Grant and friend. His superb photos and commentary make you feel as if you’ve tagged along.
Click on this link to stroll along with Tony & Guy. (Images: Barges along Regent’s Canal; John Masefield’s House. Copyright: Tony Grant)
Also recommended:
The following Audible book/Kindle book:
A Visitor’s Guide to Jane Austen’s England by Sue Wilkes. Read a preview of the book on Amazon. I’ve enjoyed listening to this informative and entertaining book on long rides and reading it while waiting at the doctor’s, or dentist’s, or when dining alone at restaurants.
Hello, my name is Vic and I live in Maryland, USA. I have adored Jane Austen almost all of my life. I am a proud lifetime member of the Jane Austen Society of North America. This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me and my team. We do not accept any form of cash advertising, sponsorship, or paid topic insertions. However, we do accept and keep books and CDs to review.
If you would like to share a new site, or point out an error, please email us. (Yes, we are fallible. We'll own up to our mistakes and will make the corrections with a polite smile on our faces.) Write us at
Thank you for visiting this blog. Your comments and suggestions are most welcome.
Coming March 1, 2022
Katherine Cowley’s second mystery in her Mary Bennet mystery series, The True Confessions of a London Spy, will be available in stores everywhere on March 1, 2022.
Available March 1, 2022.
Digital:
Top Posts & Pages
- Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
- Social Customs During the Regency
- Regency Fashion: Men's Breeches, Pantaloons, and Trousers
- The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
- Men's hair styles at the turn of the 19th century
- Regency Hygiene: The Bourdaloue
- Edward Cooper: Jane Austen’s Evangelical Cousin, Part 2
- Setting a Broken Bone: 19th century medical treatment was not for sissies
- Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable Husband
- Upstairs in Downton Abbey: The Three Crawley Sisters
-
-
Disclaimer: Our team makes no profit from this blog. We may receive books (physical or digitized) and DVDs for review purposes.
-
Copyright Statement: © Jane Austen's World blog, 2009-2022. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owners is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Jane Austen's World with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Jane Austen's World 
Disappointed so far and bored. Too early to tell.
Emma’s new Knightley quarrels as much with Emma as Mark Strong did with Kate Beckinsale’s character. It’s slow going so far. Let’s hope the pace picks up soon. Beautiful settings.
Very disappointing.
I can’t find anything good to say about it,except the absolutely marvellous portrayal of Miss Bates. which was both heartbreaking
and intriguing.
I think there should be a “liked it” – I didn’t quite love it, but did like it. Which is more to me that “wait and see,” but less than Loved it.
Next week I shall include a like it category. Good point.
I really enjoyed it – it was light, entertaining and incredibly sad in places, particularly Tamsin Greig’s portrayal of Miss Bates.
Previous adaptations of Emma, particularly Emma herself, have left me feeling quite cold…but I’m loving Romola Garai’s interpretation so far.
Johnny Lee Miller’s Knightley seems a little too young so far but I’m willing to wait and see on that front…I think he’ll grow on me!
[…] Emma 2009 Poll: What did you think of Part One? « Jane Austen’s World janeaustensworld.wordpress.com/2009/10/04/emma-2009-poll-what-did-you-think-of-part-one – view page – cached Reading Twitter, some folks are turned off by the modern approach to Emma. Curious minds want to know what you thought of the first installment of Emma 2009 with Romola Garai, Jonny Lee Miller and… (Read more)Reading Twitter, some folks are turned off by the modern approach to Emma. Curious minds want to know what you thought of the first installment of Emma 2009 with Romola Garai, Jonny Lee Miller and Michael Gambon. These are your choices: a yawner, meh, loved it, and will have to wait and see. If you would like to share your thoughts, please leave a comment. (Read less) — From the page […]
I thought it gathered pace during the course of the episode, and will hopefully continue to do so in part 2. Personally I love JLM as Knightley – and I think he’s the right age isn’t he? Jonny is 37 and I always understood George Knightley to be a similar age.
Yes, he is the right age. If Romola is 26 or 27, she is a little old for the part. I think people are blaming Jonny for being too young, when in fact Romola is older than 20-year-old Emma.
I don’t have any objection to modern interpretations – but this production (so far) has so little to do with the Austen I love that I felt very disappointed. The costumes, settings and cast are not really at fault – it’s the interpretation – not modern, just missing the genius of Austen’s subtle wit and humour.
Disappointing – it doesn’t reflect Austen’s genius and has turned “Emma” into a modern, vapid Regency romance.
I must say my expectations were high considering this is a Sandy Welch adaptation. I will hold off my final verdict, though, until I’ve seen all the episodes.
My first question is: Is the voiceover being read by Johnny Lee Miller? If so, is he reading this as Mr Knightley then, looking back on the past? Or is it just as an impartial narrator? It’s just so disconcerting for me because everytime I read Jane Austen’s novels, the third person narrator in my head is always Jane Austen’s ‘voice’ (or what I imagine her voice to be) of wit and astute observations. And when it is Knightley’s voice speaking about Emma’s thoughts… I don’t know what to make of that.
I am enjoying Romola Garai’s portrayal of Emma. Very refreshing and infinitely more palatable than Gwyneth Paltrow’s. Her eyes and face are very expressive and nuanced and she has an irrepressible energy about her that suits Emma so well. I also like that they’ve given this Emma more moments of introspection… makes this irritating Austen heroine more likeable, IMO. ;D
I’m not quite sold on JLM as Mr Knightley. Somehow, I feel he’s too young for this role, and the disparity in age with RG is not big enough, which I think is crucial in their relationship and the trials they go through. The age difference was more believable between Paltrow/Northam and Beckinsale/Strong. (But after checking IMDB, the age differences are very similar after all!) So, I think this impression is coming from JLM’s agitated gestures and unguarded facial expression. My idea of Mr. Knightley is someone who’s older, and therefore a bit wiser, who has learned to check his outbursts and be more schooled with his expressions. I guess I am very partial to Northam’s Knightley.
Although I did like the chemistry between RG and JLM in the final scene, sans JLM’s arm gesticulation. I thought the beat and timing of their exchange was really good and camera movement was quite dynamic. And I loved the final look that RG gave to the departing JLM.
I do like the introduction wherein the losses of Emma, Frank, and Jane were juxtaposed. I’m curious as to how this thread will pan out and run throughout the narrative.
I am also enjoying Louise Dylan’s Harriet as much as Toni Colette’s portrayal! She carries off this witless character with so much charm, especially that dinner scene wherein Elton comes in late. The light bulb moment just comes way too late, but I forgive her anyway.
I loved the costumes, especially Emma’s dresses, but I am disappointed with the music. In the Paltrow/Northam version, the music was almost another witty character in the dialogues. The music here does nothing to enhance to drama, IMO.
Well, I still am looking forward to the next episode. :)
I’m not sure who narrated the opening sequences, which are decidedly not in Jane’s novel and which I found a bit annoying. All that backstory took 15 minutes before Jane’s tale truly began. What a lazy way to incorporate the back story into a script.
Thank you for your insights. I am withholding judgment until I see the second episode. :) Vic
Oh I this suspense is terrible for us in the USA!
Where is the real location of Mr.Knightley’s house? Can’t find any details, but it looks at lot like Loseley House in Surrey?
It does resemble that house, doesn’t it? Nothing I can find thus far mentions that the shot we saw is of Loseley House, which is curious, but then, very little has been written about this Emma thus far.
[…] novel since the late 1970s—has been airing in the UK for the past few weeks . . . to very mixed reactions by viewers. The second Cranford movie will be airing in Britain as a Christmas special, and […]
I loved it and I love the cast! I think Romola is absolutely fascinating! i haven’t read the novel, therefore I don’t know well how much it differs from the novel, but I am familiar with the story, and I love their interpretation of it!
I’m not quite sure they captured the complexity of the novel. But it looks beautiful and the music is superb.
The thing I dislike most about the latest ‘Emma’ production is Michael Gambon’s portrayal of Mr Woodhouse. I think he is too dour, too aggressive. the 1971 production had a great Mr Woodhouse – gentle, affectionate – a hypochondriac, obviously, but at the same time concerned for others. I have an uneasy feeling of a man on the edge of a nervous breakdown with Michael Gambon.
I so agree. I can’t tell you how disappointed I was with his performance. Mr. Woodhouse is a clinging man, a hypochondriac. Michael Gambon plays the part too vigorously. To give him his due, he is hardly given any scenes in which he speaks.
I love it so far. Can’t wait for the final instalment. I’m finding it much more enjoyable than the Gwyneth Paltrow version. As someone who has not read the book, I think it’s a brilliant piece of comic drama, finely acted and produced. And a darn sight better than the tediously slow version of Sense and Sensibility that came out last year.
I’m in the US but saw it online last month (ah, well, never mind how)… anyway, I saw the comments before, and expected the worst and all. But the thing is, I just couldn’t hate it. Yes, it’s not Jane’s words, but what we expect from the book is in it, and I thought the actors were great. So no, not perfect, but still, really liked it.
Lois
I think there is always a problem comparing artists’ versions. Of course we’ll all have our preferences, but I feel it better to view the work on its own. I’ve been doing a lot of research on period customs, costumes, furnishings etc. for a project of my own and I was quite impressed with the detail and correctness (for example the same dress worn in the morning with an underlying dickey that covered Emma to her neck and then later own with the neck and upper chest bare. Also the candles placed strategically making the lighting seem realistic and demonstrating the wealth and comfort of Emma’s situation. This makes it realistic that she has no need to marry.
So often in period pieces one or two candles are supposed to light up huge spaces and the economic situations and their relationship to the romantic inclinations of the characters are not explained. This version does a very good job of portraying the class and economic issues while treating us to beautiful sets, scenery and costumes.
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by janeaustenworld: Watched Emma 2009? Tell others in this poll what you think. http://bit.ly/xqMcr…
[…] BBC in Great Britain last fall and airing on PBS Masterpiece Classic over the next three Sundays. Take a poll here and tell us what you think of Episode One. A young Emma plays with her sister Isabella in […]
Thought it was just okay. I love, love, love Jonny Lee, but he isn’t exactly my idea of Knightly. Sets were fantastic and costumes were okay. Gwyenth Paltrow to me was the best Emma. So it was definitely watchable but a lot of the remakes they have been showing on PBS haven’t been all that great. Emma was better than Northanger Abby by far.