by Brenda S. Cox
“Of these three, and indeed of all, Miss Lambe was beyond comparison the most important and precious, as she paid in proportion to her fortune. She was about seventeen, half mulatto, chilly and tender, had a maid of her own, was to have the best room in the lodgings, and was always of the first consequence in every plan of Mrs. Griffiths.” – Sanditon
This is the only time Jane Austen clearly introduces a black or mixed-race character in her fiction. And we don’t know what direction she was going to go with this young lady. (Though obviously the producers of Sanditon have made their own speculations, as have the authors of completions of the novel. My favorite completion, by the way, is here.)
Austen’s inclusion of a mixed-race character raises questions for us today:
- How many black and mixed-race people were there in Austen’s England?
- Is she likely to have known any of them?
- What were their lives like?
- How did Austen’s society view them and treat them?
I’ve been doing a lot of reading on this topic, and it’s hard to find solid answers. However, the series of posts that I’m starting today will look at the question from different angles. We’ll start today with some indications from fiction of Austen’s time. Then we’ll look at statistics from official records, using Kathleen Chater’s Untold Histories. We’ll also look at what art of the time can tell us, and consider the lives of some individual black and mixed-race people. Each of these lenses will give us a little clearer picture of black people’s lives in Austen’s England.
Miss Lambe
Miss Lambe is “half mulatto.” Nowadays “mulatto” is an offensive term, as it is based on the word “mule”; mixed-race people were believed to be sterile like mules. (Though there must have been plenty of evidence to the contrary!) But I don’t think Austen is using it pejoratively. She is simply describing Miss Lambe’s background. It sounds like Miss Lambe had a parent who was half-black and half-white, most likely her mother, and a white parent. Such pairings were quite common in the West Indies. A plantation owner might well leave his wealth to a mixed-race child.
Austen calls Miss Lambe “chilly and tender.” “Chilly” probably meant that the weather of England was too cold for her, compared to the West Indies where she grew up. “Tender” probably meant that she was delicate, easily becoming ill. Though as I imagine Miss Lambe, I like to think that “tender” also meant she was kind and gentle.
Austen sometimes describes people, such as Marianne Dashwood and Henry Tilney, as having a “brown” complexion. There’s been some speculation that she may mean to imply mixed racial backgrounds. That’s possible, but it seems a little unlikely to me. It sounds like Austen is just describing minor variations in skin tones. She usually pairs “brown” skin with dark eyes and dark hair. In one other reference, Miss Bingley says Elizabeth Bennet has become “brown and coarse.” Darcy says she is tanned from traveling in the summer.

Back to Miss Lambe. We can get some idea of what her life might have been like from a novel of the time. The Woman of Colour: A Tale was published anonymously in London in 1808, nine years before Austen began writing Sanditon. Professor Lyndon J. Dominique has edited a modern version, full of helpful background information.
Modern scholars speculate that the writer was herself a “woman of colour,” the mixed-race daughter of a West Indies planter, but we don’t know for sure who wrote the book. “People of color” may be used today to describe people of various races. However, eighteenth-century British people used it to refer to certain groups of free people in the Americas. Some included free black people, but others used the term only for those of mixed race (p. 21 in The Woman of Colour).
The novel is a series of letters from Olivia Fairfield to her former governess in Jamaica. Olivia, the daughter of a white plantation owner and a black slave, is on her way to England. Her loving father knows that because of her skin color she will never be treated as an equal by the planters of Jamaica. So he arranges that after his death she will travel to England. In England, laws and attitudes toward mixed-race people were less harsh, and tender-hearted Olivia wouldn’t have to see the suffering of the black people she identifies with. Her father, in his will, has arranged for her to marry her cousin, who will then inherit her fortune.
Already we find an interesting contrast. While black people were often treated horrifically in the West Indies, they found more acceptance in England itself.
Prejudices
The story shows some examples of prejudices that black and mixed-race people experienced in England at this time. Olivia and her black maid are called names, and yet they earn a place in society.
At her first English ball, Olivia is “an object of pretty general curiosity” (84). She says, “My colour, you know, renders me remarkable” (84). People stare at her “as if they had been invited purposely to see the untamed savage at a shilling a piece!” However, one gentleman, who calls her a “native,” adds, “In native elegance unrivalled! . . . More grace, more expression, more characteristic dignity, I never yet beheld in one female figure!” His friend calls her a “sable goddess.” Olivia enjoys the dancing, but complains that rather than rational people, she finds only “folly and dissimulation” (88).
Olivia’s maid Dido is a black woman. Though not enslaved, she seems the stereotype of the faithful black slave. She speaks in “half-broken language” (57), presumably a Jamaican dialect. She loves Olivia dearly and serves her faithfully. Olivia also loves Dido. In town, Dido says she is called names like “blacky” and “wowsky” and “squabby” and “guashy,” “and all because she has a skin not quite so white,–God Almighty help them all.” (“Wowski” was the name of an American Indian woman in a novel of 1787; “Quasheba” was the name of dark-skinned characters in novels of 1767 and 1798.) Dido says even a maid treats her like a slave. But she looks forward to their home in the countryside, where she will be the housekeeper and be in charge. Once in the country, she wins the affection of the “peasants” with her warm heart (105).
Olivia’s husband’s young nephew George thinks Olivia’s skin is “dirty” and Dido’s even dirtier. Olivia explains to him, “The same God that made you made me . . . the poor black woman—the whole world—and every creature in it! A great part of the world is peopled by creatures with skins as black as Dido’s, and as yellow as mine. God chose it should be so, and we cannot make our skins white, any more than you can make yours black” (79).
They go on to discuss the evils of slavery. The child has heard the coachman saying that “black slaves are no better than horses over there,” and Olivia explains, “Those black slaves are, by some cruel masters, obliged to work like horses . . . but God Almighty created them men, equal with their masters, if they had the same advantages, and the same blessings of education.” Olivia says that human feelings and religious principles, as well as “kindred claims,” impel her to pray for the end of slavery, the emancipation of her brethren (80-81).
Once Olivia is married and living in the countryside, she meets “East Indian Nabobs,” a family who made their fortune in India, and finds them proud and selfish. However, she is completely accepted into the social circles of her area. The most prejudice she experiences is from her sister-in-law, who is a conniving, selfish woman.
The Woman of Colour: A Tale shows some of the prejudices against black and mixed-race people in England. Nevertheless, it also implies that people of color were fully accepted in English society, particularly if they had wealth, like Austen’s Miss Lambe.
Religious Themes
The novel has many Christian themes. At this time, Christians in England, led by William Wilberforce’s “Clapham Sect,” were pushing strongly to abolish the slave trade and then slavery. Literature was one of their most important means of raising public awareness and calling for compassion for oppressed people. Evangelical Hannah More was writing tracts like “The Sorrows of Yamba: or, The Negro Woman’s Lament,” a story about an enslaved woman whose baby died in her arms on a slave ship. William Cowper, Jane Austen’s beloved poet, wrote poems condemning slavery. Cowper wrote, “We have no slaves at home – then why abroad? . . .
Slaves cannot breathe in England; if their lungs Receive our air, that moment they are free,
They touch our country and their shackles fall.” (This wasn’t strictly true, in legal terms, but was widely believed. It does point out the radical difference, though, between British colonies where slavery was part of the economy, and Britain itself.) While we don’t know who wrote The Woman of Colour, the book seems to fit with other such literature that put a human face on enslaved peoples and called for Christian compassion toward them.
Olivia’s mother was her father’s slave and his mistress. He taught her Christian faith, which she accepted eagerly. But she also learned from the church that her relationship with him was wrong, since they weren’t married. She confronted him, but he was too proud and too prejudiced to marry her. She died in childbirth. Olivia’s father raised her, gave her a good education, then sent her to England.
Her cousin Augustus, a good man, is at first repelled by Olivia’s dark complexion. However, he soon realizes that she has “a noble and dignified soul.”
Olivia is “a stranger in a strange land, where she is more likely to receive contumely [contempt] than consideration . . . a superior being, and . . . the child of humanity, the citizen of the world, with a heart teeming with benevolence and mercy towards every living creature!—She is accomplished and elegant; but her accomplishments are not the superficial acquirements of the day,–they are the result of application and genius in unison” (102-3).
In fact, Augustus and Olivia, both epitomes of beauty, intelligence, and virtue, seem to be made for each other. They marry and live happily. But—I won’t spoil it—something happens to destroy their happiness. Interestingly, the person who destroys their marriage is motivated by greed, jealousy, and class prejudices, not racial prejudices.
Olivia ends up alone, but she bears it well and peacefully. Throughout the story, she turns to God in all her trials and fears. The story ends by spelling out the moral: In times of calamity, we should seek God. Faith in God can enable us to become resigned to any hard situation.
The original editor adds that if the book can “teach [even] one skeptical European to look with a compassionate eye towards the despised native of Africa—then, whether Olivia Fairfield’s be a real or an imaginary character, I shall not regret that I have edited the Letters of a Woman of Colour!” (189)

Other Fiction of Austen’s Time
Lyndon J. Dominique, who edited the modern version of The Woman of Colour: A Tale, provides a timeline of “Women of Color in Drama and Long Prose Fiction” from 1605 to 1861. He lists 37 publications during Austen’s lifetime with black or mixed-race characters, including Sanditon. It seems likely that as an avid reader, Austen was probably familiar with some of these, or earlier ones.
Dominique includes excerpts from a few of these works, including:
Lucy Peacock’s “The Creole” (1786). A creole heiress (who may be white or mixed-race) loses her fortune to an unscrupulous husband. Only her “honest negroes” console her (196). Again there is a Christian message. The creole lady writes, “Surely . . . we have no right to tyrannize over, and treat as brutes, those who will doubtless one day be made partakers with us of an immortality. Have they not the same faculties, the same passions, and the same innate sense of good and evil? Should we, then, who are enlightened by the holy precepts of Christianity, refuse to stretch forth the friendly hand, to point these human affections to the most laudable purposes, the glory of God, and the real advantage of society?” (196) She frees her slaves.
Agnes Musgrave’s Solemn Injunctions (1798). At a boarding school, a girl is jealous of a talented, amiable young lady from the West Indies. So she “insinuates” that the girl has black ancestry and should be rejected. The other West Indian girls bring the prejudices of the islands with them to school. “In the West Indies the distinction is kept up by the women with so scrupulous an exactness, as never to mix, on equal terms, with people so descended”: they would not mix with any “child of mixed blood whose ancestors within the fourth degree of descent were negroes” (215). Here again the prejudices of the West Indies are much stronger than the prejudices of England.
Other stories include mixed-race heiresses like Olivia who are beautiful, well-educated, and virtuous Christians. They also include people who condemn “vulgar” black people. It appears that some of these stories, like The Woman of Colour, were written at least partly to help counteract prejudices and support anti-slavery causes.
I suspect Jane Austen’s Miss Lambe would have been a more balanced character then those we find in other novels of the time. Austen did not write stereotypes. However, Austen was strongly opposed to slavery* and probably would have presented Miss Lambe positively.
The Woman of Colour also includes nonfiction excerpts of the time which confirm some of the attitudes and situations represented in the novel. For example, a copy of a Jamaican planter’s will, leaving his fortune to his “reputed daughters” born of his black mistress, shows that there were mixed-race West Indian heiresses.
Next month we’ll look at who the black people in England were at this time, how they got there, and what social classes they belonged to. Scholar Kathleen Chater searched through a huge number of primary sources to find that information, so I’ll share some of that with you, from her book Untold Histories.
If you are familiar with other fiction of Austen’s era that includes black characters, tell us about those characters! Or, if you’ve read The Woman of Colour, what did you learn from it or think about it?
Learning More
On Friday, April 9, from 5:00 – 6:30 PM EDT, Professor Dominique will be giving an online seminar on “Political Blackness in The Woman of Colour,” discussing the novel he edited. You can sign up at Jane Austen & Co. The recorded talk is now available there.
If you want to start exploring more on this topic on your own, in the tabs above, under History, scroll down until you find the section I’ve added on Black History, or see Resources. It will give you a wide variety of resources to start investigating.
*I don’t intend to look at slavery in the British colonies, or abolition, in this series, but you’ll also find sources addressing those areas among the resources listed. “Austen and Antigua—Slavery in Her Time” is a good discussion of Jane Austen’s comments on slavery and her family’s connections with slave plantations.
You can connect with Brenda S. Cox, the author of this article, at Faith, Science, Joy, and Jane Austen or on Facebook.
Many thanks for your insightful examination of this book and its historical context. Looking forward to the other posts in this series!
Brenda, thank you for this fascinating post.
Wonderfully insightful post, Brenda. Even though the word mulatto has a derogatory connotation about mules, the reality about slaves and horses is more positive. In the New World, the one slave on a plantation who could be guaranteed a somewhat peaceful life was the trainer of the master’s prized horses!
Very interesting, Patty, thanks!
Brenda, there’s very little of a written record except later on. Here’s info on Robert Green, of Belle Meade Plantation in Nashville, a talented horseman.
Robert Green
1828 or 1829-1906
“In 1829, Robert Green and his parents were given to Mary Selena McNairy and William Giles Harding as a wedding gift. There is little known about his early enslaved life. However, between his innate ability and his years of experience at Belle Meade, Robert was known to be one of the foremost authorities on breeding in the thoroughbred industry. After emancipation, he chose to remain at Belle Meade and became the Head Hostler, overseeing the training and grooming of all horses.”
He earned $30. per month and here the bio fudges on his death. Apparently, his pallbearers were white which was unheard of in the South at that time.
Thanks, Patty! It’s good to hear stories of people who achieved their dreams (presumably?) despite very hard circumstances.
Thank you for this very information post. I was reminded of Thackeray’s ‘Vanity Fair’ which was written in 1847-8, but set during the Napoleonic wars. When Amelia Sedley and Becky Sharp leave Miss Pinkerton’s Academy in Chiswick, the rest of the girls are heartbroken by the loss of Amelia, including ‘Miss Swartz, the rich woolly-haired mulatto from St Kitts’ who is so hysterical that the doctor has to be called. Miss Swartz figures later in the book when Mr Osborne wants his son George to marry her and her fortune, and has forbidden him to have anything to do with the newly impoverished Amelia. She discovers Amelia’s name on a piece of sheet music and asks about her, leading to the breach between father and son that is one of the main themes of the book. George seems rather noble when defending Amelia, less so when arguing with his father later. ‘Marry that mulatto woman? I don’t like the colour, sir. Ask the black that sweeps opposite Fleet Market, sir. I’m not going to marry a Hottentot Venus.’ By the way, Amelia’s father employs a black footman, known as Sambo. It’s hard to believe that that would have been his real name.
An interesting perspective. So it sounds like a rich woman with a mixed-race background might marry well, if she found someone who could overcome his prejudices–this is what happens in The Woman of Colour. I wonder if Jane Austen would have given Miss Lambe a well-born husband.
I’ve heard that slaves were often re-named by their masters, who might not even have been able to pronounce their African names, or might not have cared.
Thank you for your research.
In a later book, Jane Eyre, Rochester’s first wife, Bertha, is suggested as of mixed race.
denise
Certainly! It is also suggested in Jane Rhys’ reinterpretation “Wide Sargasso Sea”.
Also, a really great article.
Black and British, A forgotten History by David Olusogo is worth reading. He goes into a lot of detail about Granville Sharpes law cases including of course Lord Mansfield’s decisions.Black people in Britain in the 18th and 19th century had a somewhat ambiguous legal state. Mansfiled to some extent made it all more confusing. He deliberated about one black person and he was taken to mean all black people in Britain. Even the colonies were not sre whether his rling included them too. He muddied the waters as much as help things.In London there were freemen, there were slaves, Some went from slavery to freedom . The vast majority were poor and very few became educated and a very very small number became wealthy. Then there is the Sierra Leone debacle. Even amongst the anti slavery group there was corruption it seems. I think we have to be careful how we interpret what Jane Austen herself thought about slavery. Her own family made money from slavery including her brother Henry, the banker. The economy of Britain was totally involved in the slave trade. A few references and asides in her novels which are ambiguous and the fact that she read Cowper and loved Dr Johnson doesn’t say a lot really about her beliefs. I think Janeites clutch at straws and make too much of the little evidence there is. If she really knew what happened to slaves and understood that all people were equal she would be outraged, There is no outrage from Jane Austen.She lived a very narrow life and made a lot from her understanding of human relations from this narrow world. There is nothing to say she herself didn’t think about slavery from a benign point of view,
First, thank you to Brenda for an insightful post about The Woman of Colour and other books featuring mixed-race characters – and for the reminder about the JASP lecture on April 9th [JASP has been offering a wonderful series of lectures on “Race and the Regency”] – I look forward to your future posts on this topic.
I think we are all in a state of perpetual learning right now, of heightened awareness and thank goodness for that, and even if we have looked before at these issues with an open mind, we still have much to learn, though much we can never quite understand. Since this is a Jane Austen site, we cannot ignore a conversation about Jane Austen’s views about slavery – what did she know, what did she feel, what did she do about it? I don’t know if we can assume she was strongly against slavery – what can we really know other than what we can glean from seeing what books she read, covert commentary she made… we can look at her allusions in Mansfield Park and Emma [Mansfield, Norris, Bristol, slave trade, dead silence, etc] as fairly solid proof she was opposed to slavery – Jane was writing for a public that KNEW all this – references to Mansfield and Norris would have instantly brought up the idea of slavery: she shows the Mansfield estate as a crumbling one, suffering for its dependence on a slave economy; she gives us Mrs. Norris, a nasty piece of work, and named after one of the most notorious slave traders in England. We need to research these bits that her contemporaries would have instantly recognized. Austen may not have been screaming in the streets with her cries of inequality, free the slaves, but she did it the only way she could, with her pen, and in the quiet context of village life give us a true view of humanity – the good, the bad, and the ugly.
Thank you again Brenda for this thoughtful post – The Woman of Colour has been sitting in my order cart for a few months – finally hit the “buy” button and look forward to reading it soon.
Thank you for posting this. This illustrates why I actually like the Mansfield Park older movie. It has a strong undercurrent of the British nobility built on the backs of slaves. A lot of Austen fans complained, thinking the director had gone too far, but when I reread it after watching the movie, it really was all there, just in the sub-text.
Thank you all for your thoughts.
To me the strongest evidence–and I admit it’s only brief–that Austen was against slavery comes in her letter (Jan. 24, 1813) where she says she was “in love” with the author Clarkson. Thomas Clarkson was an abolitionist and a leader in the fight against the slave trade. He traveled around England gathering evidence of the horrors of slavery and the slave trade, at great personal risk, and wrote about what he found. Austen had apparently read, and loved, his works, so she did know a lot about the horrors of slavery. And if she were at all pro-slavery, or even indifferent about it, she would NOT have loved his books!
The other strong statement we see is in Emma, where Jane Fairfax talks about the “guilt” of those who carry on the slave trade (implying that it is much greater than the guilt of those in the governess-trade). She also calls the slave trade “the sale . . . of human flesh,” which does not sound like she supports it in any way.
The references in Mansfield Park are less clear, but certainly naming the place after Lord Mansfield, who rather unwillingly made rulings against slavery in England (ambiguous though those rulings were, as Tony pointed out), and naming the very nastiest character Mrs. Norris, after an infamous slaver, are very suggestive.
There’s an interesting article in Persuasions On-line suggesting that all of Mansfield Park is a metaphor against slavery. You can access it here: Moreland Perkins, “Mansfield Park and Austen’s Reading on Slavery and Imperial Warfare” (Persuasions On-Line 26:1, Winter 2005) http://www.jasna.org/persuasions/on-line/vol26no1/perkins.htm
It’s still circumstantial evidence Brenda. I am not sure what Jane Austen really thought about slavery at all.
Agree with all your comments Brenda – I think it is all there. The Perkins’ article is very telling. I actually did a post a few years ago on slavery in MP and included a bibliography – more has been written and talked about recently and need to update this – but it shows how much discussion has surrounded this topic: https://janeausteninvermont.blog/2014/08/28/quoting-jane-austens-mansfield-park-the-issue-of-slavery-and-the-slave-trade/
And I’ve always thought the Emma quote you cite is the most telling of all.
Thanks very much, Deb. I’ve added links to your article and bibliography under the History tab above, with other resources on slavery and abolition. Mansfield Park seems to be a controversial book in many ways. I wonder if Austen had any idea how many questions she was stirring up!
Brenda, your list of information and sources on Black History is very impressive. I wonder if you could do a post of just that list, as it is a bit lost up there under the History tab – I know you direct people to it, but making it more prominent would be very helpful right now (and thanks for adding my links to it as well!)
Thank you for this informative article. I am interested in the role of women in the abolition movement and your references will be used with appreciation.
Elsie, that is a fascinating topic. If you haven’t seen it, I recommend the talk by Patricia Mathew on Wedgewood, Abolition, and the Female Consumer. You can find a recording of it at http://www.janeaustenandco.org/recorded-events