• Home
  • Audio/Podcasts
  • Austensites
  • AV/E-Texts
  • History
  • JA Novels & Bio
  • Links
  • Original Sources/19th C. Texts
  • Social Customs During the Regency
  • Teacher/Student
  • Writer/Literature Resources

Jane Austen's World

This Jane Austen blog brings Jane Austen, her novels, and the Regency Period alive through food, dress, social customs, and other 19th C. historical details related to this topic.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Footmen: Male Servants in The Regency Era
Miss Austen Regrets, Perhaps A Bit Too Much For My Taste »

The Dummification of Mansfield Park

January 27, 2008 by Vic

I’ve wracked my brains trying to come up with kind things to say about this 2007 production of Mansfield Park. ‘Nice mansion.’ ‘Pretty garden.’ ‘Glad they shot this film in England.’ ‘Where can I get a red Jezebel parasol like Mary Crawford’s?’ ‘Cute pug.’ ‘Great cleavage.’

On a superficial level this is an enjoyable film, but nothing substantive happens. Every element that makes this powerful Jane Austen novel thought provoking and crackle with tension has been squeezed out of this 90-minute adaptation. The viewer is merely left with – pulp.

I watched this movie several times, hoping to get some sense of why director Iain McDonald and writer Maggie Wadey felt they needed to dumb down the plot. Mrs. Norris is now a merely irritating figure; the Bertram sisters are almost non-existent after Maria’s marriage to Mr. Rushworth; there is no return visit to Portsmouth, in fact there is no Portsmouth at all; the Crawford siblings don’t seem to live any where; and Fanny has morphed into a sweet but stubborn, though slovenly chit who likes to play badminton and ride horses with her first cousin. Oh, and she’s wildly in love with him. One wonders why the tug of war between a young heroine who stands up for her values and moral convictions against those who are in control of her life has been reduced to a few verbal skirmishes and some minor mental anguishes.

I admit this is my least favorite Jane Austen novel, though that is by a small degree. Edmund Bertram comes across as a prig; and Fanny is much too staid and timid for my tastes. She is so morally upright that I would feel quite uncomfortable in her presence and not know precisely what to say. Whereas I suspect I could have a delightful and scintillating conversation with Lizzie Bennet, my favorite Austen heroine, or Mary Crawford, who always excited my interest more than Fanny. Not that Lizzie isn’t moral, but she does seem more approachable to me.

But I digress. Billie Piper is as far from my image of Fanny as any actress could get. Looking too modern, with features that are this side of tough, Billie is woefully miscast. I understand she chose to play Fanny, and I can imagine why. Going against type must be an attractive proposition for an actress. If she pulls off such a challenge, awards are in her future. But Billie didn’t pull this role off, and aside from her sweet, insipid version of Fanny (which is so incongruent with her looks), I found her disheveled hairdo and in-your-face cleavage distracting and not at all reminiscent of a proper Regency Miss.
The other actors and actresses were fine, especially Blake Ritson as Edmund Bertram and Haley Atwell as Mary Crawford, and they did what pitifully little they could with the material they were given.

The film’s biggest mistake was to give Mrs. Norris (Maggie O’Neil) so little airtime and to turn her into a vaguely annoying character. Mrs. Norris is verbally abusive and she plays a significant role in Fanny’s psychological development. The fact that Fanny was able to withstand the hateful words and actions of this dark and oppressive character and to stick to the moral high ground despite all the pressures placed on her is a crucial element of Fanny’s make up. Yet this subtext was almost completely swept under the rug. A knowledgeable Jane fan had to search for it in this production, and someone who has never read Mansfield Park would not even be aware of it after viewing the film.

Towards the end of the film, Edmund’s and Fanny’s fun and light proposal scene is sure to win the hearts of many viewers. (Click on video below.) I must admit the scene is cute, but I felt manipulated. I snorted with derision upon seeing Lady Bertram (Jemma Redgrave) sitting at the breakfast table (would she have bothered to get out of bed so early?), aware enough to observe the subtle looks exchanged between Fanny and Edmund, and actively engaged as a matchmaker.

If I were to give my Regency fan rating to this adaptation of Mansfield Park, I’d give it ¼ fan. After all, the pug, who remains uncredited, was adorable and eminently worth watching. For other reviews on Mansfield Park, click on PBS’s Remotely Connected My review of Northanger Abbey sits here; and click here for my review on Persuasion.

  • Find Mansfield Park Icons at this link

For other (older) reviews of the movie, click on the links below:

  • Screen Stories
  • Penny for Your Dreams
  • Inklings: Mansfield Park Book Review

Read my other post about Mansfield Park here: Mansfield Park, Mary Crawford’s Downfall in Edmund’s Eyes.

Also click here for a short piece on the two actors who played Fanny and Edmund in the 1983 version of Mansfield Park.

Billie Piper

  • Billie Piper as Fanny Price
  • Spotlight on Billie Piper

Blake Ritson

  • Mansfield Park’s Blake Ritson

Technorati Tags: Jane Austen, Masterpiece Classic, Jane Austen Novels, Jane Austen Regency

    Share with others:

    • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
    • Click to print (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
    • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

    Like this:

    Like Loading...

    Related

    Posted in Billie Piper, Blake Ritson, jane austen, Jane Austen Novels, Movie review, Regency World | Tagged jane austen blogs, Mansfield Park, Masterpiece Classic, The Complete Jane Austen | 23 Comments

    23 Responses

    1. on January 27, 2008 at 08:37 Laurel Ann

      Hi Ms. Place, thanks for the great review. I agree that the loss of much of aunt Norris’ part changed the tone of the film entirely by removing all the snideness that she projected on poor Fanny. They tried to transfer some of it to other characters, but it did not come across with the same affect. Cheers, Laurel Ann


    2. on January 27, 2008 at 12:55 Ms. Place

      I agree, Laurel Ann. Some of Mrs. Norris’ nastiness was transferred to Sir Thomas, who could not be accused of being a good step daddy under the best of circumstances. Your review on Austenprose hit the nail on the head as well. I suspect though, that these deficiencies will not dim PBS’s numbers. In fact, I believe most viewers will enjoy this version of Mansfield Park precisely because the dark elements were minimized.


    3. on January 28, 2008 at 03:36 Mansfield Park–My Reaction « KayeDacus.com

      […] already read on Ms. Place’s Jane Austen’s World Blog that Mrs. Norris’s character has basically been almost erased from existence in this […]


    4. on January 28, 2008 at 06:03 Dorothy

      I agree with every word you posted and especially enjoyed your comments on Pug’s contribution. Thanks!


    5. on January 28, 2008 at 14:30 Bibliophylia

      I completely agree with your review. I was so disappointed with this adaptation. I knew I wasn’t going to like it as soon as Gillian Anderson butchered the introduction.


    6. on January 28, 2008 at 15:18 Jaimie

      Great review and very close to how I felt about the movie. It is funny you mentioned that Fanny looked slovenly; I kept thinking “Comb your hair!” I thought one actor stood out amongst them was Douglas Hodge who played the the sometimes hard, yet beneath it all kind Sir Thomas. I felt he got it.
      I was very disappointed in Jemma Redgrave’s Lady Bertram and actually was surprised because she is usually so good. Lady Bertram is wonderfully funny and is supposed to provide some light comic relief with that pug dog of hers, who was adorable.


    7. on January 28, 2008 at 18:17 eric3000

      Thanks for the review! This is another novel I hadn’t read but don’t think that unfamiliarity made this production any better. Other than Billie Piper being completely miscast, I also couldn’t figure out any of the characters’ motivations. I always enjoy seeing Jemma Redgrave, though.

      I loved the Mary Crawford character and the actor who played her but the role really went nowhere. When she and her brother showed up at the beginning of the film it really looked promising. I thought they were pulling some kind of scam but then it turned out they just wanted to get married, like everyone else. What was the brother’s dark plan? to propose to Fanny and then dump her? I don’t get it.

      Also, what do you make of Jillian Anderson’s statements about the Mary Crawford character being based on Jane Austen, herself?


    8. on January 29, 2008 at 04:21 Ms. Place

      I think Henry was toying with Fanny at first, but then he truly fell for her. Had he won her over, he might have become a better man — for a short time. Jane Austen is too pragmatic, and one doesn’t get the sense that there would have been a happily ever after for Henry and Fanny. In time he would have strayed.

      I was totally flummoxed by Jillian Anderson’s statements. While Mary Crawford is an interesting and complex character, she doesn’t remind me of Jane. So far I haven’t come across any statements that would corroborate what Jillian said. But just because I haven’t run across those thoughts, doesn’t mean they don’t exist.


    9. on January 29, 2008 at 05:21 Lady T

      Great review and I agree with all of your points,especially regarding Aunt Norris. She is such a pivotal character in terms of molding the self loathing of Fanny and the bloated egotism of Mariah,Julia and Tom(Edmund seems to have escaped the effects of her meddlesome ways!).

      As for Henry,I always thought that he was more in love with the idea of being in love with Fanny;most of his decisions to woo her(in the book)came after some thwarted contact with Mariah. He really wanted Fanny to be his Jiminy Cricket but she refused to play along(it helped that her heart was already Edmund’s to begin with!).


    10. on January 29, 2008 at 18:19 StilettoStorytime

      I am in complete agreement with you Ms. Place and thanks so much for your blog comments. I loved your title by the way….the Dummification of Mansfield Park…that’s about right!


    11. on January 29, 2008 at 19:12 eric3000

      Thanks! It’s good to know that in the novel Henry’s motives toward Fanny are somewhat genuine. I just didn’t get that from the film at all. I couldn’t shake the feeling that he had some ulterior motive I couldn’t figure out.

      Like I said, I didn’t understand most of the characters’ actions; I understood why they did them in order to further the plot but I didn’t understand them in the context of what would feel natural for the character. Some observations:

      Mary Crawford is interested in finding a rich husband. So, obviously, she tries to marry Edmund, assuming that his older brother will die without an heir. Not a very good plan for such a practical woman.

      Edmund hear’s Fanny say the word “purple” while she is doing needlework and suddenly realizes he is madly in love with her. Huh?

      Lady Bertram says how happy she is that Fanny will never be married and always be with her. Then, suddenly, she realizes that Fanny and Edmund were always meant to be together and fixes them up. How did she go from selfish and clueless to sensitive and helpful?

      Fanny defies Sir Thomas’s wishes and then Henry runs off with Maria. Judging from Sir Thomas’s behavior toward Fanny up to that point, you would expect him to blame Fanny for the whole situation (as Mary does) but, instead, he suddenly realizes that Fanny is a wonderful person.

      And I’m sorry we didn’t get more about Mrs. Norris. I had no idea who she was. At first I thought she was the governess but then I realized she must be Lady Bertram’s sister or something.

      Obviously the film didn’t have time for major character development but they needed to do something to make the actions of the characters seem less sudden and random.

      And can I just comment on how creepy that hair-washing scene with Fanny and Edmund was? Like the final kissing scene in the recent Persuasion, it was so long and awkward. And I noticed your comment on another site about it being common for cousins to marry; but these cousins were raised as brother and sister so I think this is a little different situation and unusually nauseating.

      Oh, and I was looking up the previous adaptations on IMDB and the plot summary for the 1999 version stated something about Mansfield Park being thought to be Jane Austen’s most autobiographical novel. I don’t know where that or Jillian Anderson’s comments about Mary Crawford come from. Fanny is certainly not Jane and I agree with you that, other than being witty, Mary is nothing like Jane, either. The heroine of Persuasion is thought to be most like Jane, right?


    12. on January 30, 2008 at 03:51 Ms. Place

      Well, Eric, you pointed out a host of reasons why the dumbing down of this novel makes no sense. I wish I could answer you in full, but I am on the cusp of leaving for vacation. London, to be exact. Mayfair, to pinpoint the location. I will be breathing in the London air this time tomorrow.

      Please watch Miss Austen Regrets, which I think is a truer, though more dour version of Jane’s life than Becoming Jane. In this most recent film adaptation you will see that Jane’s wit, intelligence, independence and insight are wonderfully portrayed. In this film version, Jane seem to be a cross between Anne Elliot and Mary Crawford (whose faux pas are legion.)

      For the best insight into Jane’s character, you must read her letters. Go to Republic of Pemberley, Jane’s letters, Brabourne edition.

      Anyone else care to answer Eric? For I have plumb run out of time!


    13. on February 21, 2008 at 20:35 Lady Anne

      Dear Visitors,

      I wish to say I really enjoyed to watch this film with Bille and with Blake.It is one of the best adoptations which were taken about novels of Jane Austen.I am also interesting in the actors ,actresess life.I am thinking about their age etc etc.I would like to ask all of you if you know where can I some sort of iformation about Blake Ritson,please,send it!I think about post address or something similar.It would be so important and I would be so delighted.Thank you.

      Best wishes,

      Lady Anne


    14. on February 21, 2008 at 23:12 Ms. Place

      Lady Anne,

      Visit this link and you will find more about Blake Ritson. You will find more about him and Billie Piper here.


    15. on July 1, 2008 at 03:05 culturekiosque

      I just saw the Masterpiece adaptation… You’re right, they butcher things to fit the time, but frankly it could have been a lot worse. Check out the Patricia Rozema mutilation of the work from 1999 if you really want to see the novel hashed… Utterly laughable. Scarcely unrecognizeable. By the middle of it you’re rooting for Fanny and Henry to wind up together.

      http://www.culturekiosque.com/nouveau/cinema/rhemansfld.html

      By comparison, this was at least true enough to the spirit of the Austen work, in that Fanny was at least the moral touchstone throughout… though you’re right to call attention to Portsmouth just vanishing from the story. And the Pug is indeed irresistible. (Or maybe I just like little dogs with little legs.)


    16. on July 9, 2008 at 18:03 Myki

      Mmmm, yes and no.
      I agree that the film has become a somewhat “flying visit” to the depth of Austen, but so it is in many films, and in most book adaptations (ot just Austen either!). Thats why we still read the books – time and time again. I liked the film. Yes, Billie Piper was an “interesting” choice, but no less likeable. I loved the fact that she & Edmund had a whirlwind at the end of the film – feel good factor x 10. There is a hint of changing feelings, even with Tom complementing Fanny so much (for him anyway!). Henry was disappointing ~ he needed to be more sly, with regard to Fanny. He said all along, he just wanted to make a hole in her heart – he goes away disappointed! I thought Sir Thomas was great & though I shared some incredulity it was sweet how Lady Bertram became the saviour in the end! Without doubt though, pug was the best….!


    17. on August 23, 2008 at 08:52 Mansfield Park 2007: Another Perspective by Ellen Moody « Jane Austen’s World

      […] 23, 2008 by Vic (Ms. Place) Gentle readers, One of my most popular posts is The Dummification of Mansfield Park, which I wrote in response to the 2007 ITV adaptation of Jane Austen’s novel. In addition, […]


    18. on August 29, 2008 at 03:32 Mansfield Park (2007) Movie: Musings & Discussion: Day 13 Give-away! « Austenprose

      […] it. It fails as a true adaptation to Jane Austen’s masterpiece for many reasons which I and others have previously pointed out, but I think that I could have overlooked all of its blunders if the […]


    19. on September 1, 2008 at 01:01 Emma

      ITA w/ you Ms. Place! The ITV version of “Northanger Abbey” was the best of the (new) set of films. “Sense & Sensibility” was very good, too, though nothing can replace the wonderful Ang Lee version. Great blog!!!

      EMMA


    20. on August 14, 2009 at 16:30 Malenes bogblog» Blog Archive » Mansfield Park af Jane Austen

      […] kommentar til filmen (ikke en glad en!), endnu en ærgerlig fan, The Dummification of Mansfield Park og til sidst en meget skarp og præcis […]


    21. on February 16, 2010 at 22:57 Pugalicious: The Pug in Mansfield Park and the 19th Century « Jane Austen's World

      […] The Dummification of Mansfield Park […]


    22. on February 6, 2011 at 21:01 Frk. Nielsen » Mansfield Park

      […] kommentar til filmen (ikke en glad en!), endnu en ærgerlig fan, The Dummification of Mansfield Park og til sidst en meget skarp og præcis […]


    23. on February 19, 2011 at 15:39 drush76

      The only thing I really liked about this version of MANSFIELD PARK, was Billie Piper’s performance as Fanny Price. She didn’t portray Fanny as she was written in the novel like Sylvestra Le Touzel did. I hate to say it, but Touzel didn’t have the talent back in 1983 to carry it off. Nor did she portray Fanny as some faux Jane Austen like Frances O’Connor did in 1999. It struck me as a nicely balanced portrayal.

      Other than that, this was definitely a poor man’s adaptation of Austen’s novel. I prefer both the 1983 and 1999 versions. And quite frankly, I don’t have a high opinion of those two movies.



    Comments are closed.

    • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

      Join 7,159 other subscribers
    • Items of Interest

    • Follow Jane Austen's World on WordPress.com
    • Blog Stats

      • 16,774,699 hits
    • RECOMMENDED BOOKS AND RESOURCES

    • Fashionable Goodness: Christianity in Jane Austen's England is now available! By JAW contributor Brenda S. Cox. See Review. Available from Amazon and Jane Austen Books.
    • Praying with Jane: 31 Days through the Prayers of Jane Austen, Rachel Dodge, and a bookmark with the quote "A whole family assembling regulary for the purpose of prayer is fine!" Jane Austen, Mansfield Park
      We also recommend JAW contributor Rachel Dodge's devotionals based on Jane Austen's prayers and classic literature. Reviews:
      Praying With Jane: 31 Days Through the Prayers of Jane Austen;
      The Secret Garden Devotional;
      The Anne of Green Gables Devotional;
      The Little Women Devotional.
    • Book cover of Bath: An Adumbration in Rhyme by John Matthews
      Bath -An Adumbration in Rhyme. Edited by Ben Wiebracht. Read the review of the book at this link. Click to order the book on Amazon US or Amazon UK
    • In Sri Lanka lies the grave of Rear Admiral Charles Austen CB, Jane Austen’s Brother

      The neglected tombstone found in an overgrown burial ground.

      Rear Admiral Charles Austen CB

      Died off Prome, the 7th October 1852, while in command of the Naval Expedition on the river Irrawady against the Burmese Forces, aged 73 years.”

      The grave after restoration

      Read the full article in The Sunday Times. June 27, 2021.

    • The Obituary of Charlotte Collins by Andrew Capes

      Click on image to read the story.

    • Comments

      “My idea of good company…is the company of clever, well-informed people, who have a great deal of conversation.” – Jane Austen, Persuasion

       

      Gentle readers: Please feel free to post your comments and continue the conversation! Due to SPAM, we will no longer accept comments on posts after 30 days of publication. In some instances, links will be removed from comments as well.

    • Administrators and Contributors

      Vic Sanborn, founder of this blog, is supported by a team of talented and knowledgeable writers about Jane Austen and the Regency era. They are:

      • Brenda Cox
      • Rachel Dodge and
      • Tony Grant, who now contributes his photos from London and England

      Click on their names to enter their own blogs.

      In addition, we thank the many experts and authors who frequently contribute their posts and opinions, and who continue to do so freely or at our request.

    • Pin It!

      Follow Me on Pinterest
    • Top Posts

      • Growing Older With Jane Austen, Part 1
        Growing Older With Jane Austen, Part 1
      • The Strange Wax Effigy of Sarah Hare, 18th Century Spinster
        The Strange Wax Effigy of Sarah Hare, 18th Century Spinster
      • Regency Fashion: Men's Breeches, Pantaloons, and Trousers
        Regency Fashion: Men's Breeches, Pantaloons, and Trousers
      • Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
        Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
      • Men's hair styles at the turn of the 19th century
        Men's hair styles at the turn of the 19th century
      • Social Customs During the Regency
        Social Customs During the Regency
      • The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
        The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
      • Regency Hygiene: The Bourdaloue
        Regency Hygiene: The Bourdaloue
      • Jane Austen’s Regency Women: A Day in the Life, Part 1
        Jane Austen’s Regency Women: A Day in the Life, Part 1
      • Dancing at the Netherfield Ball: Pride and Prejudice
        Dancing at the Netherfield Ball: Pride and Prejudice
    • Recent Posts

      • Growing Older With Jane Austen, Part 1
      • Jane Austen and Rom Coms: Enemies-to-Lovers in Pride and Prejudice
      • Lady Hester Stanhope: Traveler and Trailblazer
      • Jane Austen-Themed Valentines
      • Winter, Regency Style
    • Links to Jane Austen Blogs

      Click here to enter the page. Topics include Regency fashion, historic foods, Jane Austen societies, British sites, related topics. Click on image.

    • May we suggest?

    • Hello, my name is Vic and I live in Maryland, USA. I have adored Jane Austen almost all of my life. I am a proud lifetime member of the Jane Austen Society of North America. This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me and my team. We do not accept any form of cash advertising, sponsorship, or paid topic insertions. However, we do accept and keep books and CDs to review.

      If you would like to share a new site, or point out an error, please email us. (Yes, we are fallible. We'll own up to our mistakes and will make the corrections with a polite smile on our faces.) Write us at

      gmailbw

      Thank you for visiting this blog. Your comments and suggestions are most welcome.

    • Project Gutenberg: eBook of Stage-coach and Mail in Days of Yore, Volume 2 (of 2), by Charles G. Harper

      STAGE-COACH AND MAIL IN DAYS OF YORE: A PICTURESQUE HISTORY
      OF THE COACHING AGE, VOL. II, By CHARLES G. HARPER. 1903. Click on this link.

       

    • Top Posts & Pages

      • Growing Older With Jane Austen, Part 1
      • The Strange Wax Effigy of Sarah Hare, 18th Century Spinster
      • Regency Fashion: Men's Breeches, Pantaloons, and Trousers
      • Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
      • Men's hair styles at the turn of the 19th century
      • Social Customs During the Regency
      • The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
      • Regency Hygiene: The Bourdaloue
      • Jane Austen’s Regency Women: A Day in the Life, Part 1
      • Dancing at the Netherfield Ball: Pride and Prejudice
    • Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
    • Disclaimer: Our team makes no profit from this blog. We may receive books (physical or digitized) and DVDs for review purposes.

    • Copyright Statement: © Jane Austen's World blog, 2009-2022. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owners is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Jane Austen's World with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

    Blog at WordPress.com.

    WPThemes.


    • Follow Following
      • Jane Austen's World
      • Join 7,159 other followers
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • Jane Austen's World
      • Customize
      • Follow Following
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Copy shortlink
      • Report this content
      • View post in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar
    %d bloggers like this: