• Home
  • Audio/Podcasts
  • Austensites
  • AV/E-Texts
  • History
  • JA Novels & Bio
  • Links
  • Original Sources/19th C. Texts
  • Social Customs During the Regency
  • Teacher/Student
  • Writer/Literature Resources

Jane Austen's World

This Jane Austen blog brings Jane Austen, her novels, and the Regency Period alive through food, dress, social customs, and other 19th C. historical details related to this topic.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« More Georgian Door Knockers
Lori Smith, Author of The Jane Austen Guide to Life: An Interview »

Lydia Bennet’s Letters to Kitty: A Clue About Jane Austen’s Messages to Cassandra?

May 15, 2012 by Vic

Portrait of Maria Edgeworth by John Downman (1807). Is it just wishful thinking on my part or does Jane Austen somewhat resemble this pretty, genteel author?

I’m sure others have been struck by this paragraph from Pride and Prejudice (see quote below), and wondered if perhaps it gives us a clue about how Cassandra was able to locate the many letters from Jane that she would destroy, for the majority of those that survived are innocuous and mundane. They reveal very little about the author’s observations and feelings about her family and friends, politics, and religion.

Cassandra, who outlived Jane by 26 years, kept her sister’s letters to reread during her lifetime. This gave her enough time to decide what to do with them. She burned most of Jane’s letters shortly before her death, redistributing the remaining few among friends and family.

Of the approximately 160 letters that survive from Jane, 95 were written to Cassandra. None of the letters Jane wrote to her parents survive, and very few to her brothers (none to Henry, her favorite brother). To be fair to Cassandra, who has been vilified by many for burning so many of Jane’s letters, it was the custom in those days to destroy such casual correspondence (much like we delete emails today).

A portion of Jane’s letter has been cut out. Image@Morgan Library

When they read their missives out loud to the family, the Austen sisters had a habit of censoring each other’s letters and leaving out sections that were meant to remain private.  Jane might have given us a clue in Pride and Prejudice on how Cassandra was able to go through thousands of letters and locate information that she was unwilling to pass down for posterity. In some instances Cassandra cut out the offending sentence, but generally she destroyed the entire letter. How did she know where to cut out only one sentence or passage?

This scene, in which Lydia has joined Colonel and Mrs. Foster in Brighton, gives us a clue:

When Lydia went away she promised to write very often and very minutely to her mother and Kitty, but her letters were always long expected and always very short. Those to her mother contained little else than that they were just returned from the library, where such and such officers had attended them, and where she had seen such beautiful ornaments as made her quite wild; that she had a new gown or a new parasol, which she would have described more fully, but was obliged to leave off in a violent hurry, as Mrs Forster called her and they were going to the camp; and from her correspondence with her sister there was still less to be learned, for her letters to Kitty, though rather longer, were much too full of lines under the words to be made public.

Reading out loud

Note how Kitty could not reveal the words and sentences that Lydia had underscored with lines, even to the family. Did Jane use such a system with Cassandra to keep her private thoughts only for her sister?  I’m curious to know.

  • Jane Austen’s Writing Sloping Desk
  • Ladies of the Regency: Women of Letters
  • Cassandra Elizabeth Austen: protector or vandal of Jane Austen’s legacy

Share with others:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in jane austen, Jane Austen Novels, Jane Austen's World | Tagged Cassandra Austen, Jane Austen's letters, Lydia Bennet, Pride and Prejudice | 30 Comments

30 Responses

  1. on May 15, 2012 at 09:18 Maureen Mack

    I very much enjoy your musings on Jane Austen’s world.


  2. on May 15, 2012 at 12:29 Patty

    Interesting post, Vic.

    My guess is the “genteel” Jane may have occasionally been less so in letters to Cassandra and I’m guessing she was shrewd and a bit biting in her observations of people they knew. Cassandra perhaps loved rereading those letters.


    • on May 15, 2012 at 14:58 EmSpeaks

      Oh, I hope that was the case!


  3. on May 15, 2012 at 12:57 Jean Judy

    Thank you for another very interesting post Vic. I’m sure you’re right about the “system”..Cassandra had a guide for her scissors.


  4. on May 15, 2012 at 13:27 Annettee

    Thank you for another interesting post, this is something I have thought myself


  5. on May 15, 2012 at 13:28 sshaver

    Am I confused? Wouldn’t the underscored words just be indications of Lydia’s silliness and overenthusiastic prattling?


    • on May 15, 2012 at 14:42 Vic

      Hi SShaver, Read the last 13 words of the passage for clarity. Kitty cannot share the underscored information with others. While Lydia’s reasons for underscoring might be different from Jane Austen’s, I think their underlining would serve the same purpose of keeping certain information private.


  6. on May 15, 2012 at 14:28 Jean Judy

    Sshaver, You missed the part in Chapter 42…. ‘and from her correspondence with her sister, there was still less to be learnt-for her letters to Kitty, though rather longer, were much too full of lines under the words to be made public.’

    So, Kitty kept anything underlined from her family…later she very much regretted keeping Lydia’s attachment to Mr. Wickman to herself.


  7. on May 15, 2012 at 14:33 Ms. Kathleen

    That certainly does make one curious but it is still such a shame to lose all those wonderful letters. Enjoy your thoughts :)


  8. on May 15, 2012 at 15:30 Liz Cooper

    Thanks for pointing out how Cassandra safeguarded so many of her sister’s letters. I tire of hearing Cassandra blamed for burning Austen’s letters. It is only because of Cassandra that so many of Austen’s letters survive. Of the thousands of letters Austen must have written to her sailor brothers only about a dozen survive and as you pointed out none of the ones written to Henry survive. We are lucky Cassandra kept what she did!


  9. on May 15, 2012 at 16:39 ladyofquality

    I do recall reading that paragraph, and wrote the underscoring off as sshaver did, as things that were lewd, raucous, inappropriate, etc. Now that you put that thought in mind, though, I’m sure you’re correct. Seems like a great way to censor things so the reader doesn’t have to be so careful with others (just skip this).

    Thanks for another insightful post, Vic!


  10. on May 15, 2012 at 18:29 kfield2

    I had never really given that a thought. Now I understand the meaning of underlining in the letters. I just assumed it was Lydia “talking in all caps” like what annoys people on the receiving end of e-mails or facebook. I tend to be an over-user of the exclamation point which I’ve tried to cut back on. An enthusiastic person, especially a silly enthusiastic person, seems to take some form of punctuation usage and dwell on it. Anyway, thanks for the post! It was very informative.


  11. on May 16, 2012 at 00:50 mitchell

    Lydia and Kitty Bennett were fictional characters. Jane Austen, and her beloved sister Cassandra, were not.
    For those of us who are edging toward old age, and who are lifelong Janeites, this increasing obsession and speculation regarding the novelist is becoming tedious. Not as tedious as the dozens, possibly hundreds, of sequels and prequels, zombie crap and vampire crap that are being churned out endlessly.
    My late mother, who wrote her BA honours thesis on “Emma” in 1940, bought “Pemberley Shades” in the 1950, a few years after it was published, and read it whilst pregnant with me. I own her copy and with only a very few exceptions, it remains the only book using Jane’s creations that is reasonably good. Charlotte Bronte was served far better by Jean Rhys in “The Wide Sargasso Sea” and Daphne DuMaurier was especially well served by Sally Beauman in “Rebecca’s Tale.” And yes, I thought PD James did a decent job in “Death at Pemberley” which I uite enjoyed. But it’s time for all those who spin tales about Georgiana Darcy or Charlotte Collins to move on, and create characters of their own. As a poet, I admit, in my youth, to having written a sonnet about P and P. But 14 lines is not a very long bit of writing. This parasitical cottage industry that poor Jane has engendered should stop.


    • on May 16, 2012 at 09:45 Vic

      I don’t write Austenesque fiction, Mitchell. And this is merely harmless speculation. Yes, my blog might be considered a bit obsessive, but I think I bring my own perspective to a fascinating era, one that many others seem to enjoy. The word tedious has seldom been applied by my readers.

      You leap from my wondering about underlining being an efficient method of communication between two sisters (Jane, after all, wrote from observing customs and habits that were prevalent in her own age, and she was a realist) to remarks of tediousness to condemning a parasitical cottage industry is a bit of a stretch.

      Perhaps only PhDs and scholars who have handled original texts are allowed to speculate about a detail that seems logical? I didn’t turn Jane and Cassandra into vampires, I merely wondered if Jane wrote the sentence about Lydia and Kitty because she might have given them the system that she and Cassandra used. Having seen a letter with a single finely snipped-out sentence up close, I wondered how Cassandra could have honed in on that one sentence in one of many long letters – and so I had my “ah ha” moment when I reread the passage about Lydia.

      You said:

      “Lydia and Kitty Bennett were fictional characters. Jane Austen, and her beloved sister Cassandra, were not.”

      Is it your thought that Jane Austen used nothing from her personal life or her family members in writing her books? We are all entitled to our opinions, Mitchell. I frankly think that my conjecture, after 6 years of almost daily studying and writing about Jane Austen and her era, gives me licence to speculate on a topic I have come to know quite well. My question at the end of the post was to engage readers in a discussion. Merely that.


      • on May 16, 2012 at 11:09 Jean Judy

        Bravo Vic, very well said. I daresay if one doesn’t like the intellectual discussion one simply needn’t engage in it. As evidence that many do enjoy and engage in the discussions… this fine blog has been read and enjoyed for several years. I look forward to every new page.

        As for the so-called cottage industry–I’m for anything that leads to reading, enjoying and loving Jane Austen ..whether that be a movie or a book sequel of any kind.

        I allow Mitchell is entitled to his opinion but I would like to think he hadn’t thought of every angle when he published his comment. Perhaps after some consideration of the points that Vic just made I hope he might soften his opinion a tad….or not, whatever… his opinion didn’t change mine.

        Long Live Jane Austen.


    • on May 16, 2012 at 12:53 Tony Grant

      Yes Mitchell, Lydia and Kitty were fictional characters but surely you know very well that writers reflect their times and the really good ones, like Austen, give us an insight into the human condition that bridges all ages.

      I think Vic’s speculation that this passage can give us an insight into Cassandra’s approach to editing her sisters letters is a very valid comment.

      As for spin off novels, I agree, I don’t like the genre at all.But many, find it a way of engaging with Jane’s characters. It’s not my way or your way but some people need it. Let them be.

      The Wide Sargasso Sea is a piece of very good literature in it’s own right. As such it is not a spin off novel in the usual way. It is commenting on life and the world of the 18th century colonies in a specific way and is not at all an extension to Jayne Ayre. The focus is the Rochester’s relationship. Jane Ayre focusses on Jayne Ayre.

      I must admit I have never read Pemberley Shades but they do say that music and sounds played to a baby in the womb has an effect on them for life.

      Are we allowed to guess at the effect it had on you?

      All the very best,
      Tony

      PS I presume you live in England.


    • on May 17, 2012 at 02:37 kfield2

      Mitchell, while we can appreciate that what this blog does may not meet your needs, it is a pleasant refuge for many of us in a crazy world and you are not forced to read it. I sense Vic took offense for the same reason I took offense for her and for all of other Janeites, many proudly members of JASNA or JAS. Who do you think you are posting vitirol on a blog that is loved by many? If you found things tedious, then don’t stop here again. And please stop standing in judgement on this “parasitical cottage industry”. You may not like it and you are entitled to your opinion. But there are many who do. Your message wound all around the place so it was tough to decide just what ticked you off the most, or perhaps you’d had a bad day and decided to take out your frustrations here. Please reconsider before you decide where you are going to display your arrogance on Jane Austen. You did not say who you were addressing in your first comments but we all assumed it was Vic and then the readers of Vic’s blog. Your “apology” was negated by the words following it. Your words were disingenuous at the very least. Please pick another blog to have your “hissy-fit” on next time.


      • on May 17, 2012 at 10:47 Ms. Kathleen

        I adore this blog. I find it fun, interesting, challenging and a wonderful escape from the tedium of everyday life. I enjoy some of the modern day Janeite type novels, some I don’t, but to each their own. This is a happy place :)

        Mitchell, go away… You are no fun. Find somewhere else to spit your vile venom – and please stay away from my blog.

        Thank you!


        • on May 17, 2012 at 13:29 mitchell

          I shall unsubscribe at once. I have been reading this blog, merely to amuse myself because of my fondness and appreciation of Austen, and have often winced at the constant syntactical and sometimes even grammatical errors I find in Vic’s writing consistently. Obviously someone myself should stick to more literate and knowledgeable blogs.


      • on May 17, 2012 at 18:46 Tony Grant

        “Obviously someone myself should stick to more literate and knowledgeable blogs.”

        This just happens to have a grammatical mistake in it. Also using the word,”Obviously,” is a colloquial way of speaking.The use of “consistently,”in the second to last sentence is wrong, Mitchell. As for you being literate and knowledgeable,you appear to be neither.You don’t really seem to be that well educated. You come across as uncouth.

        Now just go away and learn some manners and I think you should read some books properly.


    • on May 20, 2012 at 09:39 bluffkinghal

      Don’t like, don’t read? Why try to put down the writer of a fine blog, who is passionate about her subject, and who has readers (including me) that love her posts? Why not start your own blog whining about how tired you are of Jane Austen, vampires, zombies, all those who write, not to mention cottage industries. Good luck!


  12. on May 16, 2012 at 13:06 mitchell

    Vic, my diatribe was not directed towards you, which you would have seen had you read it without having an instant hissy-fit. I merely pointed out that the Bennets were fictional; when I still taught one of the courses I taught was called “Autobiography and Fiction: Versions of Self” and this is a topic that has always fascinated me. I apologise for having inadvertently ruffled your feathers from what you chose to infer as criticism. Had you read this without the grip of emotion you might have seen that my contempt is — justifiably — reserved for the hordes of second raters who flood the market with their faux-Jane novels.

    I no longer live in England. I am American although I was a Londoner for many years.
    mitchell


    • on May 17, 2012 at 02:47 kfield2

      Mitchell, from what I’ve read from both of your comments here, you show no respect for this blog nor for its readers. Your comments were your opinions and you are entitled to them, but do you really think that this was the place to put them, and in such and arrogant fashion? I found both of your comments (posts) to be offensive to both Vic and this community. I did not find that Vic’s response to your first comment was at all “in the grip of emotion” nor was she engaging in a “hissy-fit” but I do find your comments completely inappropriate and full of emotion. As to your contempt on fan-fiction being “justifiable”, that is merely your opinion. Try selling that arrogance somewhere else, since you clearly don’t add anything but vitriol here.


  13. on May 16, 2012 at 21:28 cathyallen

    What a brilliant deduction, Vic! I’d never have thought of it, and it makes perfect sense. Thank you.


    • on May 17, 2012 at 18:24 cathyallen

      P.S. I was not going to comment on the fellow above (and I quote him here: “Obviously someone myself should stick to more literate and knowledgeable blogs.” — copied and pasted, so it is exactly as he wrote it), because I think Elinor said it best, in Sense and Sensibility, I “…did not think he deserved the compliment of rational opposition.” (Ch. 36 – BIG thanks to Graciela at RoP for finding it for me!)

      So, Vic, if your blog is not “literate and knowledgeable” (*giggle*), I’ll eat my hat! Thanks, yet again, for all you’ve done to add to our understanding of Jane Austen’s World!


      • on May 17, 2012 at 22:09 kfield2

        Cathy, I was just about to comment on the last comment of Mitchell’s about exactly what you called him out on but found you had already done it. Well done.


  14. on May 17, 2012 at 20:45 Vidya

    Good musings…Vic. Cassandra’s intentions in burning the letters are definitely well intentioned for her time, after all it wasn’t the era of bare it all on reality tv shows. But for us the Austen fans it does seem like a shame that we did not have a window to her private thoughts. Ah, the mysteries of the universe…


  15. on May 17, 2012 at 23:34 Beth

    What an interesting theory, Vic! It makes a lot sense. And as much as I wish that we had more letters from Jane, I am thankful that we have any at all. Cassandra’s burning and censoring of letters of a more personal and/or sensitive nature does make sense to me. I can understand her reluctance to share those things. And thanks for sharing the portrait of Maria Edgeworth too. It is so pretty!

    And in regards to Mitchell, sometime it is not the opinion itself that is the problem, it is the manner in which it is expressed.


  16. on May 18, 2012 at 14:35 Steph

    mitchell, dude, get over yourself. Yes, I called you “dude”. It’s more polite than other words that could be used.
    Vic, this was a very interesting post. I had never before thought about Lydia’s underlined text as a means of communicating to her sister what was not to be shared with others. The speculation that this was also a method used by Jane and Cassandra seems a valid theory to me.


  17. on July 1, 2012 at 00:24 murosymuebles

    Reblogged this on Murosymuebles's Blog.



Comments are closed.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 7,126 other subscribers
  • Items of Interest

  • Follow Jane Austen's World on WordPress.com
  • Blog Stats

    • 16,638,175 hits
  • RECOMMENDED BOOKS AND RESOURCES

  • Fashionable Goodness: Christianity in Jane Austen's England is now available! By JAW contributor Brenda S. Cox. See Review. Available from Amazon and Jane Austen Books.
  • Praying with Jane: 31 Days through the Prayers of Jane Austen, Rachel Dodge, and a bookmark with the quote "A whole family assembling regulary for the purpose of prayer is fine!" Jane Austen, Mansfield Park
    We also recommend JAW contributor Rachel Dodge's devotionals based on Jane Austen's prayers and classic literature. Reviews:
    Praying With Jane: 31 Days Through the Prayers of Jane Austen;
    The Secret Garden Devotional;
    The Anne of Green Gables Devotional;
    The Little Women Devotional.
  • Book cover of Bath: An Adumbration in Rhyme by John Matthews
    Bath -An Adumbration in Rhyme. Edited by Ben Wiebracht. Read the review of the book at this link. Click to order the book on Amazon US or Amazon UK
  • In Sri Lanka lies the grave of Rear Admiral Charles Austen CB, Jane Austen’s Brother

    The neglected tombstone found in an overgrown burial ground.

    Rear Admiral Charles Austen CB

    Died off Prome, the 7th October 1852, while in command of the Naval Expedition on the river Irrawady against the Burmese Forces, aged 73 years.”

    The grave after restoration

    Read the full article in The Sunday Times. June 27, 2021.

  • The Obituary of Charlotte Collins by Andrew Capes

    Click on image to read the story.

  • Comments

    “My idea of good company…is the company of clever, well-informed people, who have a great deal of conversation.” – Jane Austen, Persuasion

     

    Gentle readers: Please feel free to post your comments and continue the conversation! Due to SPAM, we will no longer accept comments on posts after 30 days of publication. In some instances, links will be removed from comments as well.

  • Administrators and Contributors

    Vic Sanborn, founder of this blog, is supported by a team of talented and knowledgeable writers about Jane Austen and the Regency era. They are:

    • Brenda Cox
    • Rachel Dodge and
    • Tony Grant, who now contributes his photos from London and England

    Click on their names to enter their own blogs.

    In addition, we thank the many experts and authors who frequently contribute their posts and opinions, and who continue to do so freely or at our request.

  • Pin It!

    Follow Me on Pinterest
  • Top Posts

    • Regency Fashion: Men's Breeches, Pantaloons, and Trousers
      Regency Fashion: Men's Breeches, Pantaloons, and Trousers
    • Social Customs During the Regency
      Social Customs During the Regency
    • Men's hair styles at the turn of the 19th century
      Men's hair styles at the turn of the 19th century
    • Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
      Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
    • Dressing for the Netherfield Ball in Pride and Prejudice: Regency Fashion
      Dressing for the Netherfield Ball in Pride and Prejudice: Regency Fashion
    • The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
      The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
    • Dancing at the Netherfield Ball: Pride and Prejudice
      Dancing at the Netherfield Ball: Pride and Prejudice
    • Regency Hygiene: The Bourdaloue
      Regency Hygiene: The Bourdaloue
    • Captain Wentworth’s Love Letter
      Captain Wentworth’s Love Letter
    • Winter, Regency Style
      Winter, Regency Style
  • Recent Posts

    • Winter, Regency Style
    • Book Review: Ayesha at Last by Uzma Jalaluddin
    • Tracing Jane Austen’s Royal Ancestors Via Her Parents, by Ronald Dunning
    • Happy Birthday, Cassandra Austen!
    • Segmented Sleep: A common Phenomenon Before the Industrial Revolution
  • Links to Jane Austen Blogs

    Click here to enter the page. Topics include Regency fashion, historic foods, Jane Austen societies, British sites, related topics. Click on image.

  • May we suggest?

  • Hello, my name is Vic and I live in Maryland, USA. I have adored Jane Austen almost all of my life. I am a proud lifetime member of the Jane Austen Society of North America. This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me and my team. We do not accept any form of cash advertising, sponsorship, or paid topic insertions. However, we do accept and keep books and CDs to review.

    If you would like to share a new site, or point out an error, please email us. (Yes, we are fallible. We'll own up to our mistakes and will make the corrections with a polite smile on our faces.) Write us at

    gmailbw

    Thank you for visiting this blog. Your comments and suggestions are most welcome.

  • Project Gutenberg: eBook of Stage-coach and Mail in Days of Yore, Volume 2 (of 2), by Charles G. Harper

    STAGE-COACH AND MAIL IN DAYS OF YORE: A PICTURESQUE HISTORY
    OF THE COACHING AGE, VOL. II, By CHARLES G. HARPER. 1903. Click on this link.

     

  • Top Posts & Pages

    • Regency Fashion: Men's Breeches, Pantaloons, and Trousers
    • Social Customs During the Regency
    • Men's hair styles at the turn of the 19th century
    • Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
    • Dressing for the Netherfield Ball in Pride and Prejudice: Regency Fashion
    • The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
    • Dancing at the Netherfield Ball: Pride and Prejudice
    • Regency Hygiene: The Bourdaloue
    • Captain Wentworth’s Love Letter
    • Winter, Regency Style
  • Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
  • Disclaimer: Our team makes no profit from this blog. We may receive books (physical or digitized) and DVDs for review purposes.

  • Copyright Statement: © Jane Austen's World blog, 2009-2022. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owners is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Jane Austen's World with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Jane Austen's World
    • Join 7,126 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Jane Austen's World
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: