A good friend, after watching all episodes of Andrew Davies’ Sanditon, wrote to express the thought that Young Stringer was more suited for Charlotte than Sidney Parker. Young Stringer, played by Leo Suter, is an actor as handsome as Theo James, who played Sidney Parker, although Theo is darkly handsome, whereas Leo has a kinder face.
Young Stringer
Young Stringer is an ambitious working man who aims to use his talents as a designer and architect to move up in life. Stringer ‘s infatuation with Charlotte reminds me of Robert Martin’s unquestioning love for Harriett Smith in Emma.The difference is that Charlotte is no one’s fool and so much smarter than Harriett. Her common sense and insights fascinate Sydney, who is attracted to her despite his inner misgivings.
At the time my friend chose Young Stringer over Sydney, I thought that the former was an invention of Andrew Davies and his team. It turns out I was wrong. Austen briefly describes him through Tom Parker. He says:
“But, my dear love, as to garden stuff, you were saying that any accidental omission is supplied in a moment by Lady Denham’s gardener. But it occurs to me that we ought to go elsewhere upon such occasions, and that old Stringer and his son have a higher claim. I encouraged him to set up, you know, and am afraid he does not do very well. That is, there has not been time enough yet. He will do very well beyond a doubt. But at first it is uphill work, and therefore we must give him what help we can. When any vegetables or fruit happen to be wanted—and it will not be amiss to have them often wanted, to have something or other forgotten most days—just to have a nominal supply, you know, that poor old Andrew may not lose his daily job—but in fact to buy the chief of our consumption from the Stringers.”
“Very well, my love, that can be easily done. And cook will be satisfied, which will be a great comfort, for she is always complaining of old Andrew now and says he never brings her what she wants.”
Old Stringer and his son are struggling fruit and vegetable farmers in Austen’s version. Tom and Mary Parker are discussing this situation as they pass by their old, snug house, which they had abandoned in favor of an exposed location in Sanditon without protection from the sun and wind. Mary is nostalgic for the old days; Tom is a forward-looking enthusiast, an early 19thcentury term that meant someone who was full of enthusiasm for a cause or a passionate belief in something that has merit. In Tom Parker’s instance, it is Sanditon, the sort of seaside town that sprouted all over the Sussex Coast in late 18th– early 19thcentury Britain.
Tom Parker feels responsible for the Stringers’ situation, since he recruited them to set up business in Sanditon – a future town that is half finished and has yet to attract important clients. Mary agrees that purchasing their goods would provide some compensation. And that’s the end of the Stringers’ participation in Austen’s unfinished novel.
Andrew Davies and his team turned the farmers into builders, with Old Stringer employed as stone mason and foreman. Tom Parker has run out of funds, and thus Old Stringer works as a laborer to help get the job done. Young Stringer demonstrates his talent by designing a beautiful Pagoda that would be the centerpiece of the newly built crescent. He believes his talent will provide him with an upwardly mobile life. Sadly, Tom informs him that the pagoda will not be built and Young Stringer burns his plans in frustration. Every time he sees Charlotte, his face lights up. They have a casual friendship, mostly from her side since it is obviously that Young Stringer is hopelessly infatuated, but I can see how my friend still hopes that they will get together romantically.
Sidney Parker
Now, onto Sydney Parker. In Emma, Austen built up the reader’s expectations of Frank Churchill by providing information about him in dribs and drabs and through Emma’s assumptions, many of which (upon a second reading of the novel) were erroneous and wrong. In a similar fashion, she built up the reader’s knowledge of Sidney in the novel fragment of Sanditon. In the first nine chapters the reader learns about him through his siblings Tom Parker and Diana as they conversed with each other and with others. Tom and his wife, Mary, first discussed Old Stringer’s financial situation. They then moved on to the old house, the family seat, which they had abandoned for Trafalgar House in Sanditon. Mary speaks nostalgically of the house and its snug situation, which sheltered the house from damaging winds and storms. On seeing her former home, she says to Tom and Charlotte, who they are taking to Sanditon in gratitude for the Heywood’s hospitality,
“There now the old house is quite left behind. What is it your brother Sidney says about its being a hospital?”
“Oh, my dear Mary, merely a joke of his. He pretends to advise me to make a hospital of it. He pretends to laugh at my improvements. Sidney says anything, you know. He has always said what he chose, of and to us all. Most families have such a member among them, I believe, Miss Heywood. There is someone in most families privileged by superior abilities or spirits to say anything. In ours, it is Sidney, who is a very clever young man and with great powers of pleasing. He lives too much in the world to be settled; that is his only fault. He is here and there and everywhere. I wish we may get him to Sanditon. I should like to have you acquainted with him. And it would be a fine thing for the place! Such a young man as Sidney, with his neat equipage and fashionable air. You and I, Mary, know what effect it might have. Many a respectable family, many a careful mother, many a pretty daughter might it secure us to the prejudice of Eastbourne and Hastings.”
Tom is certainly impressed by his younger, middle brother. Then in Chapter 5, Mr Parker looks over letters before dinner.
“Not a line from Sidney!” said he. “He is an idle fellow. I sent him an account of my accident from Willingden and thought he would have vouchsafed me an answer. But perhaps it implies that he is coming himself. I trust it may. But here is a letter from one of my sisters. They never fail me. Women are the only correspondents to be depended on. Now, Mary,” smiling at his wife, “before I open it, what shall we guess as to the state of health of those it comes from or rather what would Sidney say if he were here? Sidney is a saucy fellow, Miss Heywood. And you must know, he will have it there is a good deal of imagination in my two sisters’ complaints…and our youngest brother, who lives with them and who is not much above twenty, I am sorry to say is almost as great an invalid as themselves. He is so delicate that he can engage in no profession. Sidney laughs at him. But it really is no joke, though Sidney often makes me laugh at them all in spite of myself. Now, if he were here, I know he would be offering odds that either Susan, Diana or Arthur would appear by this letter to have been at the point of death within the last month.”
Jane has established that Sidney has no use for hypochondriacs and that he isn’t above making fun of his youngest brother and two sisters, who were condensed into one woman in Davies’ Sanditon. Later in the same chapter, Tom continues talking to Charlotte as he reads a letter from one of his sisters, Diana, most likely, who attempts to recruit women from a boarding school, including a West Indian from Surrey (Miss Lambe), in order to increase visitors to the practically empty town.
I have heard nothing of Sidney since your being together in town, but conclude his scheme to the Isle of Wight has not taken place or we should have seen him in his way. Most sincerely do we wish you a good season at Sanditon, and though we cannot contribute to your Beau Monde in person, we are doing our utmost to send you company worth having and think we may safely reckon on securing you two large families, one a rich West Indian from Surrey, the other a most respectable Girls Boarding School, or Academy, from Camberwell. I will not tell you how many people I have employed in the business—Wheel within wheel—but success more than repays. Yours most affectionately.”
“Well,” said Mr. Parker, as he finished. “Though I dare say Sidney might find something extremely entertaining in this letter and make us laugh for half an hour together.”
The reader receives the impression that Sidney is busy with his own schemes and is much admired by his siblings. Tom mentions Sidney one more time at the end of Chapter 9 and says gratefully:
“I got this man a hare from one of Sidney’s friends; and he recommended Sanditon.”
The reader finally meets Sidney in Chapter 12, just before Austen set the novel aside.
It was a close, misty morning and, when they reached the brow of the hill, they could not for some time make out what sort of carriage it was which they saw coming up. It appeared at different moments to be everything from a gig to a phaeton, from one horse to four; and just as they were concluding in favour of a tandem, little Mary’s young eyes distinguished the coachman and she eagerly called out, “It is Uncle Sidney, Mama, it is indeed.” And so it proved.
Mr. Sidney Parker, driving his servant in a very neat carriage, was soon opposite to them, and they all stopped for a few minutes. The manners of the Parkers were always pleasant among themselves; and it was a very friendly meeting between Sidney and his sister-in-law, who was most kindly taking it for granted that he was on his way to Trafalgar House. This he declined, however. He was “just come from Eastbourne proposing to spend two or three days, as it might happen, at Sanditon” but the hotel must be his quarters. He was expecting to be joined there by a friend or two.”
The rest was common enquiries and remarks, with kind notice of little Mary, and a very well-bred bow and proper address to Miss Heywood on her being named to him. And they parted to meet again within a few hours. Sidney Parker was about seven or eight and twenty, very good-looking, with a decided air of ease and fashion and a lively countenance. This adventure afforded agreeable discussion for some time. Mrs. Parker entered into all her husband’s joy on the occasion and exulted in the credit which Sidney’s arrival would give to the place.”
Austen’s build up of this potential hero (which is still in question among scholars) intrigues the reader. Would he turn out to be a disappointment like Frank Churchill, or a hero and love interest worthy of Charlotte? Unlike Austen, Davies introduces Sidney in the first episode and rushes his introduction to Charlotte. They clash at an assembly ball. While I found Austen’s introduction of Sidney intriguing, Davies’ treatment of Sidney resembles more the hero of a bodice ripping Harlequin romance novel than a complex Austen character.
What say you in this very simple poll? Sidney or Young Stringer? What are your thoughts of the series so far?
This is a good analysis. I wrote one on my blog, and as a result of comments I was led to talk about an element in Stringer’s fate that you are not dwelling on here but is important and is in Austen: Tom Parker’s irresponsibility, which is developed by Davies rightly — and even more by Anna LeFroy in her continuation. Austen has Sidney say he is expecting friends and in Lefroy’s continuation one of these is a shady banker. We are seeing Davies try to show Sidney Parker’s change-over in the way he did Darcy in his 1995 P&P only he has made Sidney so angry and not likable and has also made Charlotte so appealing — so intelligent and able and responsible. In my blog I suggested a lot of this Sanditon comes from the tiniest and larger twigs of Austen’s fragment – I did read the fragment and came up with the same passages about Sidney and Stringer — and Lefroy; the departures also remember what Davies did in previous film adaptations and he noticed in other film adaptations (Barrington and Esther walking by the waterfall and having that witty contest can be found in a 1986 Northanger Abbey).
https://reveriesunderthesignofausten.wordpress.com/2020/01/30/andrew-davies-cos-sanditon-episodes-1-4-by-the-sea-by-the-sea-by-thebeautiful-sea/
Ellen, you are right about Tom. He’s unrealistically optimistic – always hoping for more funds, more visitors (of the right sort), a doctor, a resort reputation to rival (or outdo) competitors with nothing more than hope and a prayer. He depends on Sidney, his sister, Lady Denham, and his wife’s silent and supportive acquiescence. As you noted in your analysis, only Stringer seems to work for a living – the other men, being gentlemen, are all talk. Sidney at least brings his friends and tries to make deals. Thanks for stopping by!
Well, I thought it was obvious that Davies intended us to see that Stringer was the obvious choice and that Sidney was going to be the one she actually fell for. Perhaps, if they succeed in making a sequel to this pretend Sanditon, we shall find out which one she ends up with – or not.
Thanks for your comment. I thought the last name Stringer had meaning (as in stringing the reader/viewer along) and that this was a glaring clue. Leo Suter as Young Stringer is just so likable and hard working. He and Charlotte share a genuine friendship and enjoy each others’ company.
The sexual tension between Sidney and Charlotte and their constant misunderstanding cause me to wish that for once, just once, let the sweet guy win. My short poll seemingly says that other viewers feel the same.
I didn’t like Stringer’s treatment of his dad even though his dad wasn’t very nice either. Sidney, OTOH, forgoes happiness forever to help his brother out, and I rather liked him – a bit more complicated than the other boy.
RE: Young Stringer, see my answer below. I do like that Davies and his team did not create cookie cutter suitors – they both have positive and negative qualities. Still, Young Stringer is concerned about the welfare of his fellow workers. He might treat his father harshly, but I find that one is more open and opinionated with one’s close family than with friends or employers.
But would this not have been considered a degrading alliance in Austen’s very class-conscious world for Charlotte, a gentleman’s daughter, to end up someone like Young Stringer? He does seem like a lovely person, especially compared to the often-hostile and rude Sidney Parker. But still. One more way this mini-series struck a wrong note for me.
Good points. This is why I love these discussions. Your comments make me think of the following: I view Young Stringer’s treatment of his father as representative of the clash between the old lifestyle versus the new progressive thinking. I may be too deep for a Davies television series, but not for a Jane Austen novel. In “Sanditon” she was beginning to explore the changes in the traditional British way of life. Upward mobility, though severely limited, was possible for some. Young Stringer’s ambition might be realistic, evidenced by his excellent architectural rendering of a pagoda. We’ll see.
As for his suitability for Charlotte, yes it’s a stretch, but she is the eldest daughter with 13 siblings. How much can her gentleman farmer father donate towards her dowry, given that his assets should remain intact for his eldest son? Charlotte, it’s been surmised, not only acts as an observer but may well not be the heroine of Austen’s plot. (Sanditon: The Kingdom of Folly, John Lauber; Jane Austen Sanditon, Oxford University Press, 2019 Intro by Kathryn Sutherland).
Another thought is that Charlotte might represent Austen, the author and observer. At the end, she could choose her own path and an independent course as Jane herself did.
Although my heart says Sidney (that deep voice- swoon); my head says Stringer. Sidney seems like trouble in the long run to this long-married lady. If I were 20, well…
LOL
I voted for young Stringer. Because I really liked him. Someone like Charlotte would be a great asset as a wife. Encouraging. Enthusiastic. Sympathetic. You can picture them laughing with a bunch of children going to visit her parents and old Stringer living with them.
But that’s not the direction this story is going.
Since Andrew Davies has taken such liberties, why not take the liberty of changing the odious potential mate for Charlotte and switching it to a promising young Stringer dude?
Thanks for explaining the book for those of us who haven’t read it! As for Sidney versus Stringer, setting aside that Charlotte and Stringer seem to be from slightly different classes, as another commenter has pointed out, I definitely prefer him.
At 18, I would instantly have fallen for Sidney because of the passionate tension between him and Charlotte and, of course, for his dark good looks. But, while I like Sidney for his loyalty to family, as a romantic interest, he has a bit of a darker side. The relationship between him and Charlotte echoes that of Darcy and Elizabeth, but they are not Darcy and Elizabeth. When Sidney gets angry, he screams at Charlotte, sometimes to the point that you wonder if he’s going to hit her. He lets his rage get out of control. If a man talked to my little sister like that, I would take steps to ensure he stayed away from her. (Note: I love Theo James and think he is doing a wonderful job. It’s a question of the writing for me. We know Sidney is going to turn out to be a good guy at heart. I’m just not sure that the writers should be sending the message that good guys talk to girls like this/will change once they are in love, or that a relationship could flourish in a healthy manner when this is it’s backdrop.)
Now that I’m 28, I can definitely see the foundations for a much more solid, compatible, and loving relationship with Stringer. There is a sweetness between them.
Full disclosure: I’ve only gotten as far as PBS has shown, so I don’t know the ending yet!
Thanks again!
I’ve tried hard not to include spoilers. Watching this series unfold his half the fun.
I agree about your assessment of Sidney. Regarding Stringer, he’s from a different class than Charlotte, but unlike Fanny Price’s father (Mansfield Park), who married a woman way above his station, but who was lazy and slovenly, Young Stringer aims to improve himself through talent and hard work. Some doors were opening to the lower classes during the Regency to move up the social ladder. Charlotte, while a gentleman’s daughter, was the eldest of 18 children. Her dowry would have been insignificant and not attractive to most of the men of her class. She might have, like Charlotte Lucas, been tempted to look for a husband elsewhere. Then again, she might have chosen to remain single, just like Jane Austen did. It’s fun to conjecture
I agree, Charlotte and Stringer’s situations somehow make it just possible in our imaginations that the could have been together. It’s even kind of an intriguing thought. I agree, very fun to conjecture!