Vic’s Review
Imagine a mystery novel that features Mary Bennet as its investigative heroine! Author Katherine Cowley’s choice of Mary, the largely unnoticed Bennet daughter in Pride and Prejudice, piqued my interest. While Cowley kept some of Mary’s idiosyncrasies and insecurities as the middle child, she has created a sympathetic character, whose strengths as a keen observer accustomed to sitting on the sidelines help her solve a murder.
The book opens just after Mr Bennet’s death, with 19-year-old Mary sitting vigil near her father’s body at Longbourn. It is night and the house is deathly quiet. As she reminisces about past regrets and current events, she comes to dread her future as an unmarried daughter. Her safest choice would be to live with Mrs Bennet, but Mary wants to leave Meryton and wonders if she should take the bold step of earning her own way in life, as a governess perhaps?
Her reveries are interrupted by the sound of a carriage. Not expecting company at such a late hour, Mary reluctantly asks a maid to let the mysterious visitors in. The door opens to two strangers, Lady Trafford, a strong-willed woman who rarely considers the word “no” as an answer to her requests, and her secretive nephew, Mr. Withrow. Lady Trafford ostensibly came to pay her respects to the mourning family, claiming kinship, but the reason for her visit soon becomes clear—to offer Mary an invitation to live with her at Castle Durrington in Sussex, for reasons that don’t quite make sense to the young woman.
After some persuasion and mental list-making, Mary accepts Lady Trafford’s invitation, and so her adventures as a sleuth begin. The following passage with Mrs Bennet, Lady Trafford, and Mary gives you some idea of Cowley’s writing style, which is her own, but echoes Jane Austen’s in a delightful way:
“Surely it is owed to us, Mary, for you to have such an opportunity. Especially as you are not beautiful like your sisters, and you have had no suitors.”
“I have already made up my mind, Mother.”
“You cannot possibly think to turn down Lady Trafford’s offer! What an inconsiderate child you are.”
“I did not say how I had made up my mind.”
“What do you say, Miss Bennet? Will you join me at Castle Durrington?”
“How big is your library?” asked Mary. “And do you have a pianoforte?”- p.56
In her first days at the castle, Mary becomes embroiled in a mystery. Then, during a brisk walk to the Sussex coast, she stumbles upon a body lying face down in the sea. After meeting a few more characters and getting to know Lady Trafford and Mr Withrow better, she no longer knows who to trust. Given free rein to Castle Durrington’s library, her research leads her to more unsettling truths.
Cowley writes the book from Mary’s point of view, which is refreshing, for we come to know her as a fully realized person, one who is willing to learn and eager to take lessons to improve herself. She is a careful list maker and planner, and one who combines the characteristics of a good investigator—that of an observant, nondescript, determined, and note-taking woman—who people seldom notice.
This first published book by Katherine Cowley will appeal to readers who enjoy murder mysteries set in the Regency era with a castle and rugged English coastline as a setting. Readers are also given a host of suspects to suss out until the solution is revealed. I had a great time sussing wilst arriving at my own conclusions to the mystery in this novel!
Interview with Katherine Cowley
-
Katherine Cowley
What about Mary Bennet’s character appealed to you to write about her? Which of her traits in Pride and Prejudice did you develop to further and enhance your mystery plot for this novel and make her more interesting?
One of the things that appealed to me most about Mary Bennet is the fact that others overlook her—she is ignored, dismissed, and snubbed. And shouldn’t those who are quiet and overlooked be able to have their own stories, their own adventures?
Mary Bennet is very analytical, she loves to read, and she’s good at remembering things. Like Mary, I know what it’s like to say the wrong thing in a group setting, or to embarrass myself in conversation, or to not feel comfortable in all situations.
So much is left open about Mary’s character—what is it that she wants? It’s clear that she wants to read and play the pianoforte and have peace and quiet, and there’s a brief mention by Austen that Mary had hoped Mr. Collins would propose to her. But beyond that, we don’t know what Mary wants. In part, I wrote this book to figure that out.
In terms of characteristics that I developed, I played up Mary’s observational skills, and I gave her a desire to learn French and drawing. Also, if Mary does not know what to do in a situation, she’ll think about what one of her sisters would do in such a moment, and often that ends up being the perfect action for her to take.
- Briefly describe your writing process for us (if this is possible). What I mean is, did you develop a plot outline first (with the ending always in mind)? And then allowed the characters to speak to you as you wrote about them? Or did you “stay with the program?” You also mentioned a community of writing help in your acknowledgments—how did they influence your thoughts before, during, and after the process?
I would categorize myself as both an outliner and a discovery writer. I did write an outline before the first draft, with some of the major events I wanted in the story (for example, I knew I wanted French and drawing lessons, and I knew I needed a big ball scene that had all sorts of mystery and intrigue and would also act as an important moment for Mary’s character). I also had a very clear vision of what the final chapter would look like.
But then I “discovered” (or figured out as I went along) all sorts of characters and events and situations as I wrote.
I don’t know the exact how length of my first draft, but the second draft of the novel was about 55,000 words. While there was mystery, there was not a dead body—it was not yet a murder mystery. That came in a later draft.
I wrote five drafts of the novel before querying literary agents. My writing group read one chapter a month and gave me feedback, and I sent the second, third, and fourth draft of my novel to new sets of readers—a mixture of other writers and trusted readers who love Jane Austen. This community was so helpful in helping me refine my ideas, improve my writing, solve plot problems, and figure out what was and was not working.
I wrote two additional drafts with my literary agent (the first was a major revision, and the second was a minor revision). After my book was acquired by my publisher, I did a revision with the editor, a second revision to shorten the book by 1000 words, a copy edit, and proofreads.
Now that it’s finished, the novel is about 90,000 words (so 35,000 words longer than the second draft). It was a lengthy process to get the story from where it started to where it is today.
- In this day and age, it is unusual for a new author to have a book published, but you have two more Mary Bennet mystery sequels in the pipeline. Kudos! I suspect this has more to do with hard work than luck. What advice would you give to other hopeful authors who are writing their first books?
If you’re writing a first book, my biggest advice is to keep writing, and to push through and finish the book. When I first began trying to write books, I started a lot of novels that I never finished, sometimes due to perfectionism or not knowing what I wanted to do with the story or because I became distracted by a shiny new idea.
I learned a lot from books that helped me understand structure and plot, and there’s so much you can learn about writing craft from the Internet, from books, and from writing conferences. But there’s a lot that you can only learn by doing it. Push through, finish a first draft, and let go of perfectionism. And then take the time to get feedback from other writers and revise, revise, revise. Then, if you would like to publish the book, make sure to take the time to learn all you can about publication and different publishing options.
__________________
The book will be available on April 22nd, 2021. Find purchase information for preordering in the US, Canada, UK, Australia, and other locations on Katherine Cowley’s site.
I enjoyed the Q&A. I’ve heard so many wonderful things about this book.
denise
I read it in three sittings, Denise, which is unusual for me, since I juggle several books at a time!
As a Mary Bennet fan I have already pre-ordered my Kindle copy, and will be ordering the paperback on release.
I love having both the kindle copy and the paperback, since the Kindle is instantly accessible on my smart phone when I am waiting at the doctor’s office or in line. Glad to know you think like me!!
I just pre-ordered a kindle copy. Thanks for the review and heads up. I recently ploughed through a couple of very good, but heavy, non-fiction books on the issues of today’s problems, and the grim history of how we got here. I’m so ready for an Austin mystery! Another place, another time, not my own.
You hit the nail on the head! My recent non-fiction books, zoom workshops, and newspaper articles have been heavy reading/watching these days. Katherine Cowley has given us a respite from our daily concerns and placed them all on Mary. Hah!
I always feel very sorry for Mary who seems to have a very raw deal. She is the third daughter to parents who have been waiting for a son to cut off the entail. I imagine the senior Bennets, entranced with their first two delightful daughters, but feeling it really is time for the son to arrive and being very disappointed by daughter number three, especially when she proves not to be pretty and charming like her elder sisters. By the time daughters four and five arrive, the parents have probably come to terms with their fate. Then poor Mary proves to have no real talent for the ladylike and acceptable pursuits that she follows. If she could have benefited from a more rounded education, she might have discovered her real talents. This is true of so many of Jane’s characters. Imagine Emma if she had been able to go to university. Or think of her most odious character, Mrs Norris in ‘Mansfield House’. Fanny herself realises to her shame that Aunt Norris would have made a better job than own her mother of raising a family on a small budget. So much of her nastiness and interfering arises from not having a real role in life.
‘her own mother’ – sorry
Marijo, you make several good points, especially about the deficiency of women’s education during Austen’s time. Mary’s character is the least fleshed out of the Bennet sisters, and Katherine Cowley has done her the honor of giving her an exciting life.
As for Mrs. Norris, I have just finished Paula Byrne’s excellent book, Belle: The Slave Daughter and the Chief Justice. In the afterword, Byrne mentions that before Sir Thomas’s absence to mend the problems of his plantation in Antiqua he asked Mrs. Norris to run Mansfield Park in his absence. She used her power in such a way that his opinion of her sank more each day as he observed her effect in his family.
The name Mansfield Park conjures up William Murray, 1st Earl of Mansfield, then Lord Chief Justice who ruled on the legality of the slave trade in England. which was abolished in 1807. Robert Norris was a slave captain. Jane Austen, through her brother Edward, visited Kenwood, the country house of Lord Mansfield. It’s all a tangle, but one of the most unpleasant (and that is a kind word) characters Austen created in any of her novels is Mrs. Norris. It’s interesting to conjecture that she purposefully named Mrs. Norris after a slave trader. :)
I feel sure that the choice of the names ‘Mansfield House’ and ‘Norris’ were deliberate, Lord Mansfield being associated with the abolition of the slave trade and Robert Norris being one its staunchest defenders. This does seem to indicate that Jane was opposed to the trade. However there’s a certain ambiguity as it’s hard to believe that the Bertram family’s wealth was not at least partly derived from slavery which still existed on Antigua in Jane’s time, although in 1834 it became the first British island to be completely emancipated.
However loathsome we find Mrs Norris, I think we must also acknowledge that Sir Thomas couldn’t have left his wife in charge while he was away, which must have been the normal arrangement in such circumstances. It amuses me that the family seem to accept Lady Bertram’s complete ineptitude and indolence as perfectly natural and blameless.
I live in Archway, north London and often take the bus to Kenwood – in these Covid times only to stroll round the grounds and onto Hampstead Heath. The house is due to re-open on 17th May I’m glad to say, but for the time being it will be necessary to book a visit in advance. Unlike other English Heritage properties, it is free to visit because of the last private owner’s bequest to the nation.
Good points all. I am envious that you were/are able to visit Kenwood and its grounds, which would be high on my list to visit next time I come to London. Lady Bertram is a one of a kind character, isn’t she? So lazy and indolent. I have always disliked/hated Mrs Norris’s bullying of Fanny, which she hid well from Sir Thomas. Certainly he made his fortune from the slave trade, and Jane must have been well aware that the rich families surrounding her made much of their fortunes that way as well, so that the source of Sir Thomas’s wealth makes sense. I’ve read Mansfield Park only twice, but I am planning to read it again with new eyes.
Wonderful interview and insight. I look forward to reading more about Mary Bennet as I do love secondary characters being further developed from Jane Austen’s novels. I also love a good Rregency/Victorian mystery! Congratulations!
Thanks for the compliment. I think you will find this book satisfying in more ways than one. Let me know what you think of it, better yet, let Katherine Cowley know!
I don’t understand this trend of sentimentalising Mary Bennet. In Jane Austen’s book she is a caricature of a would-be bluestocking who pushes forward at every opportunity her limited talents and learning, and unwanted opinions. I can see comic possibilities for her as a pretentious and bumbling character who accidentally solves crimes, but to portray her as intelligent and resourceful is to assign the name of Jane Austen’s creation to a completely different person.