Feeds:
Posts
Comments


Once you admit that the Jane Austen depicted onscreen bears scant relation to any person named Jane Austen, living or dead, the film fulfills its purpose. I had never before considered her as a cricketer, for instance, and I am fairly sure that she never sought to elope, but I enjoyed both inventions—the one bucolic and triumphant, the other sodden and frustrated, and presumably meant as a precursor to Lydia’s running away with Wickham in “Pride and Prejudice.”

Lover Beware, Anthony Lane, The New Yorker, August 13, 2007

Becoming Jane is based on a chapter in Jon Spence’s 2003 critical biography, Becoming Jane Austen. In the book, Spence does identify Tom Lefroy as the love of Austen’s life and her relationship with him as the origin of her genius. But he never suggests that there was an aborted elopement (much less subsequent reading sessions with any of Lefroy’s children). And he is careful, as the filmmakers are not, to clarify that in speculating about Austen’s romantic experience he is reading between the lines of the family records and of the three rather opaque Austen letters that are his principal sources.

Deidre Lynch, See Jane Elope

I am listing only those reviews that reflect my take on the movie:

Illustration by Lara Tomlin, New Yorker

Podcasts About Napoleon

Military History Podcast features the following podcasts about Napoleon’s life, rise, and fall:


Legacy Design’s Legacy Pride Paper Dolls designs and sells a series of spectacular paper dolls based on literary characters and authors, such as the one of Anne Elliott above. I had highlighted only one or two in a previous post, but the author of Old Grey Pony kindly sent links to a slew of them that I could not ignore. Check out her website, including Georgian Resources, if you haven’t seen them so far and bookmark them. They are well worth the return visits.
Click on these links to find:

Jane Austen
Wentworth
Henry Tilney
Edward Ferrars
Elinor Dashwood
Edmund Bertram
Fanny Price
Emma Woodhouse
Knightly
Elizabeth Bennet
Darcy
Josephine Bonaparte
Revolutionary Fashion

Before photography, tracing silhouettes was a hugely popular and inexpensive way of capturing a person’s likeness. Even financially stretched families could afford to have a family member stand in front of a light. Their profiles were then traced onto a sheet of paper and cut with scissors. Granted, artistry was involved in the tracing and cutting, for the difference between one person and the next is in the minutest proportions. Should the tracer trace slightly wrong or cut off a tad too much, a different image will result from the original model. Witness these two silhouettes claimed to be of Jane Austen. The first was created around 1800 in Bath.

The second image of Jane, supposedly traced in 1815, shows a more pronounced nose. If one didn’t have the illustration of Jane’s father to compare to this silhouette, one might completely dismiss it. But one can see a distinct resemblance in the shapes of the noses. If this is not an image of Jane (and the Victorian hairdo and high collar or necklace suggest it is not), one can still conclude that the image might be of a family member. Read more about these two images of Jane here.



Learn more about silhouette making in these links:

A Glimpse of Jane Austen at Work

Marianne, “a niece of Austen’s, ” recalls the memory of Jane sitting quietly in the library Godmersham, her sewing on her lap, saying nothing for a long time. Suddenly Jane would burst out laughing, jump up and run across the room to find pens and paper and write something down. Then she would return to her fireside seat and go on stitching quietly as before.


From: Obstinate Heart: A Biography, by Valery Grosvenor Myer, 1997

The quote is from this review: Jane Austen: As Rich a Mix as Any of Her Women, Christopher Lehman, New York Time, April, 1997