• Home
  • Audio/Podcasts
  • Austensites
  • AV/E-Texts
  • History
  • JA Novels & Bio
  • Links
  • Original Sources/19th C. Texts
  • Social Customs During the Regency
  • Teacher/Student
  • Writer/Literature Resources

Jane Austen's World

This Jane Austen blog brings Jane Austen, her novels, and the Regency Period alive through food, dress, social customs, and other 19th C. historical details related to this topic.

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« World War 1 is featured in Downton Abbey, by Tony Grant
Death Comes to Pemberley and Other Matters Pertaining to Jane Austen Sequels »

Secrets of the Manor House: Recap and Review

January 22, 2012 by Vic

This Sunday, PBS will air on most stations an hour presentation of  Secrets of the Manor House, a documentary narrated by Samuel West, that explains how society was transformed in the years leading up to World War One. Expert historians, such as Lawrence James and Dr. Elisabeth Kehoe, discuss what life was like in these houses, explain the hierarchy of the British establishment, and provide historical and social context for viewers. For American viewers of Downton Abbey, this special couldn’t have come at a better time.

The British manor house represented a world of privilege, grace, dignity and power.

For their services for the King in war, soldiers were awarded lands and titles. The aristocracy rose from a warrior class.

This world was inhabited by an elite class of people who were descended from a line of professional fighting men, whose titles and land were bestowed on them by a grateful king.

Manderston House, Berwickshire.

For over a thousand years, aristocrats viewed themselves as a race apart, their power and wealth predicated on titles, landed wealth, and political standing.

Huge tracts of lands with fields, villages, laborers' cottages, and forests surrounded country estates.

Vast landed estates were their domain, where a strict hierarchy of class was followed above stairs as well as below it. In 1912, 1 ½ million servants tended to the needs of their masters. As many as 100 would be employed as butler, housekeeper, house maids, kitchen maids, footmen, valets, cooks, grooms, chauffeurs, forestry men, and agricultural workers. Tradition kept everyone in line, and deference and obedience to your betters were expected (and given).

22 staff were required to run Manderston House, which employed 100 servants, many of whom worked in the gardens, fields, and forests.

As a new century began, the divide between rich and poor was tremendous. While the rich threw more extravagant parties and lived lavish lives, the poor were doomed to live lives of servitude and hard work.

Lord Palmer pulls on a false bookcase to open a passage to the next room.

Manderston House in Berwickshire represents the excesses of its time. The great house consists of 109 rooms, and employed 98 servants just before the outbreak of World War One. Twenty two servants worked inside the house to tend to Lord Palmer and his family. Every room inside the house interconnected.

The curtains in the ballroom of Manderston House look as fresh as the year they were made in 1904.

The curtains and drapes, woven with gold and silver thread, were made in Paris in 1904 and cost the equivalent of 1.5 million dollars. Manderston House itself was renovated at the turn of the century for 20 million dollars in today’s money. This was during an era when scullery maids earned the equivalent of $50 per year.

Once can clearly see the differences in bell sizes in this photo.

The servant hall boasted 56 bells, each of a different size that produced a unique ring tone. Servants were expected to memorize the sound for the areas that were under their responsibility.

Scullery maids were placed at the bottom of the servant hierarchy. They rose before dawn to start the kitchen fires and put water on to boil. Their job was to scrub the pots, pans and dishes, and floors, and even wait on other servants.

Life was not a bed of roses for the working class and the gulf between the rich and poor could not have been wider than during the turn of the 21st century.

Thoroughbred horses lived better than the working classes.

While the servants slept in the attic or basement, thoroughbred horses were housed in expensively designed stable blocks. As many as 16 grooms worked in the stables, for no expense was spared in tending to their needs.

The stables at Manderston House required 16 grooms to feed, care for, and exercise the horses.

As men and women worked long hours, as much as 17-18 hours per day, the rich during the Edwardian era lived extravagant, indulgent lives of relaxation and pleasure, attending endless rounds of balls, shooting parties, race meetings, and dinner parties.

Up to the moment that war was declared, the upper classes lived as if their privileged lives would never change.

The Edwardian era marked the last great gasp of manor house living with its opportunities of providing endless pleasure. For the working class and poor, the inequities within the system became more and more apparent. The landed rich possessed over one half of the land. Their power was rooted in owning land, for people who lived on the land paid rent. The landed gentry also received income from investments,  rich mineral deposits on their land, timber, vegetables grown in their fields, and animals shipped to market.

The lord of the manor and his steward can be seen walking among the farm laborers, many of whom were women.

The need to keep country estates intact and perpetuate a family’s power was so important that the eldest son inherited everything – the estate, title, all the houses, jewels, furnishings, and art. The laws of primogeniture ensured that country estates would not be whittled away over succeeding generations. In order to consolidate power, everything (or as much as possible) was preserved. Entailment, a law that went back to the 13th century, ensured that portions of an estate could not be sold off.

The Lord Mayor of London was seated at the center of the table next to the Countesses of Stamford and Lichfield.

The system was rigged to favor the rich. Only men who owned land could vote, and hereditary peers were automatically given a seat in the House of Lords. By inviting powerful guests to their country estates, they could lobby for their special interests across a dinner table, at a shoot, or at a men’s club.

Thoroughbred horses were valued for their breeding and valor, traits that aristocrats identified with.

The Industrial Revolution brought about changes in agricultural practices and inventions that presaged the decline of aristocratic wealth. Agricultural revenues, the basis on which landed wealth in the UK was founded, were in decline. Due to better transportation and refrigeration, grain transported from Australia and the U.S. became cheaper to purchase. Individuals were able to build wealth in other ways – as bankers and financiers. While the landed gentry could still tap resources from their lands and expand into the colonies, the empire too began to crumble with the rise of nationalism and nation states.

The servant hierarchy echoed the distinctions of class upstairs. The chef worked at the end of the table on the left, while the lowest ranking kitchen maids chopped vegetables at the far right. The kitchen staff worked 17 hours a day and rarely left the kitchen.

Contrasted with the opulent life above stairs was an endless life of drudgery below stairs. On a large estate that entertained visitors, over 100 meals were prepared daily. Servants rose at dawn and had to stay up until the last guest went to bed. Kitchen maids, who made the equivalent of 28 dollars per year, rarely strayed outside the kitchen.

Steep back stairs that servants used. Out of sight/out of mind.

One bath required 45 gallons of water, which had to be hauled by hand up steep, narrow stairs. At times, a dozen guests might take baths on the same day. House maids worked quietly and unseen all over the manor house. The were expected to move from room to room using their own staircases and corridors. Underground tunnels allowed servants to move unseen crossing courtyards.

Manderston House's current butler shows the servant's hall

Maids and footmen lived in their own quarters in the attic or basement. Men were separated from the women and were expected to use different stairs. Discipline was strict. Servants could be dismissed without notice for the most minor infraction.

Footmen tended to be young, tall, and good looking.

Footmen, whose livery cost more than their yearly salary, were status symbols. Chosen for their height and looks, they were the only servants allowed to assist the butler at dinner table. These men were the only servants allowed upstairs.

Green baize doors separated the servants quarters from the master's domain.

Green baize doors were special doors that marked the end of the servants quarters and hid the smells of cooking and noises of the servants from the family.

The Jerome sisters were (l to r) Jennie, Clara, and Leonie.

As revenues from agriculture dwindled, the upper classes searched for a new infusion of capital.This they found in the American heiress, whose fathers had built up their wealth from trade and transportation. Free from the laws of primogeniture, these wealthy capitalists distributed their wealth among their children, sharing it equally among sons and daughters. The ‘Buccaneers,’ as early American heiresses were called, infused the British estates with wealth. ‘Cash for titles’ brought 60 million dollars into the British upper class system via 100 transatlantic marriages.

Working class family

Transatlantic passages worked both ways, even as American heiresses crossed over to the U.K.,  millions of British workers emigrated to America looking for a better life. The sinking of the Titanic, just two years before the outbreak of World War One, underscored the pervasive issue of class.

Most likely this lifeboat from the Titanic was filled with upper class women and children. Only 1 in 3 people survived.

The different social strata were housed according to rank, and it was hard to ignore that a large percentage of first class women and children survived, while the majority of third and second class passengers died.

Labor strikes became common all over the world, including the U.K.

Society changed as the working class became more assertive and went on strikes. The Suffragette movement gained momentum. Prime Minister David Lloyd George was a proponent of reform, even as the aristocracy tried to carry on as before.

Lloyd George campaigned for progressive causes.

Inventions revolutionized the work place. Electricity, telephones, the type writer, and other labor-saving devices threatened jobs in service. A big house could be run with fewer staff, and by the 1920s a manor house that required 100 servants needed only 30-40.

Change is ever present. The last typewriter factory shut its doors in April, 2011.

Women who would otherwise have gone into service were lured into secretarial jobs, which had been revolutionized by the telephone and typewriter.

Many of the aristocratic young men in this photo would not return from war.

The manor house set enjoyed one last season in the summer of 1914, just before war began. Many of the young men who attended those parties would not return from France. Few expected that this war would last for six months, much less four years. Officers lost their lives by a greater percentage than ordinary soldiers, and the casualty lists were filled with the names of aristocratic men and the upper class.

Over 35 million soldiers and civilians died in World War 1

Common soldiers who had died by the millions had been unable to vote. Such inequities did not go unnoticed. Social discontent, noticeable before the war, resulted in reform – the many changes ushered in modern Britain.

As the 20th century progressed, owners found it increasingly hard to maintain their manor houses. According to Lost Heritage, over 1,800 have been lost.

Watch Secrets of the Manor HouseJanuary 22 on PBS. All images from Secrets of the Manor House.

Please note: All advertisements on this blog are placed here by wordpress. I earn no income from my blog.

Share with others:

  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Edwardian Life, Jane Austen's World, Movie review, Servants, Upper Class, Working class | Tagged Edwardian Britain, Edwardian servants, Footmen, Manderston House, PBS Movie Review, Secrets of the Manor House | 20 Comments

20 Responses

  1. on January 22, 2012 at 15:25 Reader

    “The different social strata were housed according to rank, and it was hard to ignore that a large percentage of first class women and children survived, while the majority of third and second class passengers died.”

    John R. Henderson compiled statistics on the Titantic passengers, including survivors by class (servants totaled separately).

    Women: first class 97% (100%); second class 86%; third class 49%

    Men: first class 34% (17%); second class 8% (0%); third class 13%

    http://www.ithaca.edu/staff/jhenderson/titanic.html


    • on January 22, 2012 at 16:01 Vic

      Thank you for those stats!


  2. on January 22, 2012 at 15:25 Ellen Rose of england

    come and see an English manor house in Maytime 2012 for a Jane Austen Gorhic soiree as part of our Rgeneyc Festival including Costumed Ball and afternoon tea and exploration of the boyhood of Alfred Lord Tennysons at the Rectory he was born in at Somersby —please google The Horncastle Regency Festival and dance the night away to Harmonies of Time. Also costumary lecture and Regency events in the time of Miss Jane Austen .


  3. on January 22, 2012 at 15:29 LR @ Magnificent or Egregious

    I love your blog, I found it last week when someone commented on Tom & Lorenzo’s Downton Abbey post. So many fascinating posts, thanks for sharing!


    • on January 22, 2012 at 16:02 Vic

      Thank you for visiting! I stop by at T&Los frequently to leave outrageous remarks about fashion.


  4. on January 22, 2012 at 19:41 Evangeline Holland

    I watched this last week and while I enjoyed it, I did have a good chuckle because I could have put this documentary together myself, as I knew all of the information presented!


    • on January 22, 2012 at 22:59 Vic

      So true, though the visuals are lovely. I hope people rush over to your blog, Evangeline, since it covers precisely this era.


  5. on January 22, 2012 at 20:26 Shelley

    I still remember from Upstairs, Downstairs: after World War I, it was a different world.

    Innocence (and guilty assumptions about women, races, etc.) once lost can never be the same.


  6. on January 23, 2012 at 03:35 Barbara Simmons

    Watched the show on PBS tonight and found it very interesting. I was born in England and still remember class distinction in the 1950’s. I bet it still exists today. Love Downton Abbey!


  7. on January 23, 2012 at 03:42 Linda Merrill

    My local PBS – WGBH/Boston (where I used to work so I know where they are!) station didn’t carry this special this weekend – just repeated Ep 2 of DA. This special was on the tv listings, but we never saw it. Looks really interesting too. I assume it will be aired at some point this week.


    • on January 28, 2012 at 22:17 QNPoohBear

      Can you pick up RI PBS ch.36? They aired the show last night and will repeat it again Monday afternoon and a few other times. WGBH’s website isn’t showing it airing at all soon. I am also very surprised they didn’t air it last week. I always watch Downton Abbey on WGBH.


  8. on January 23, 2012 at 08:15 dentelline

    Hi Vic,
    I love all these photos!
    It’s amazing!
    Thanks for sharing!
    Have a good day!


  9. on January 23, 2012 at 08:52 Chris Squire

    This essay is a curious mix of fact and fiction: I am curious to know what primary sources you were using. Your description of the lives of the servants, etc. in a country house is spot on but some bits are plain wrong:

    ‘Only men who owned land could vote, and they were automatically given a seat in the House of Lords.’ for example; in fact, the right to vote during this period was set by the Representation of the People Act 1884 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_Act_1884 which ‘ . . extended the 1867 concessions from the boroughs to the countryside . . in England and Wales, 2 in 3 adult males had the vote . . The British electorate now totalled over 5,500,000 . . ’. Only hereditary peers sat in the House of Lords [as the name suggests]; other big landowners might hope for and get a peerage but there was nothing automatic about it.

    Beneath the aristocracy was the much more numerous gentry; the younger sons of peers became gents and might even have to work for a living; the nouveau riche became peers, like my ancestor the first earl of Harewood, whose fortune came from slaves and sugar. The gentry were mixed up with the rapidly expanding urban middle class; their younger sons had to join it and make their own way in the world if they could. Fortunes rose and fell rapidly: ‘clogs to clogs in three generations’ they said in Yorkshire.

    The use of the term ‘manor house’ is wrong too: Manderston House is a ‘country seat’: ‘The mansion and demesne in which a county family is seated or established; the residence of a country gentleman or nobleman; a country-house.
    . . 1711 J. Addison Spectator No. 37. ¶4 A Description of her Country-Seat‥about an Hundred Miles distant from London.
    . . 1866 Trollope Belton Estate I. i. 2 Belton Castle is a pretty country seat, standing in a small but beautifully wooded park.’ [OED]

    A ‘manor house’ is ‘A mansion which belongs (or used to belong) to the lord of a manor.’ These would often be houses, better than farm-houses, but not sumptuous enough to be called seats or capital mansions. They have survived much better than country houses as they are small enough to be habitable nowadays – indeed they are much sought after by today’s nouveau riche. My brother lives in our family home, a Domesday Book manor http://domesdaymap.co.uk/place/SE2692/holtby-hall/, which is just such a house. The family seat of the now extinct senior branch of the family became a police college and is now a luxury hotel http://www.solbergehall.co.uk/ ; another just down the road, built by my other Harewood ancestor just before the Great War finished off that way of life, is now an old folks home: http://www.carehome.co.uk/carehome.cfm/searchazref/20004020LEEA

    I look forward to your next essay.


    • on January 23, 2012 at 10:11 Vic

      Hi Chris, thanks for stopping by and leaving your insights. I made the change in the word ‘they’ and inserted hereditary peer. That was my mistake. (I wish I had an editor who catches those mistakes).

      This post is cobbled together from notes that I took during the show. Two of the historians quoted are Lawrence James and Elisabeth Kehoe. The show was produced by a British company, Pioneer productions. All the images are pulled from the show, which covered several centuries.

      Lord Palmer, who currently resides in Manderston House was interviewed, and he recounted much history about the house. Obviously, since the show is titled Secrets of the Manor House and the producers chose to film Manderston House extensively, they implied that Manderston House is a manor house.


  10. on January 23, 2012 at 20:00 Edwardian Promenade | la belle epoque in our modern world

    […] Recap and Review – Jane Austen’s World Edwardian England Revealed: Secrets of the Manor House – […]


  11. on January 23, 2012 at 23:23 Karen Field

    I really enjoyed watching that. I’ve now enjoyed reading the blog and comments afterward.


  12. on January 24, 2012 at 17:02 The Lit Bitch

    Love your blog, you have lots of interesting posts and content here!! Love that you are posting stuff about the Edwardian era!!! Keep up the great work!!


  13. on January 24, 2012 at 20:47 lookingforpemberley

    Thanks for your extensive and historically accurate posts! I really enjoyed this one especially, and thought you had awesome pictures. I was wondering if you would mind me adding you to my “Jane Austen Resources” blogroll?

    I only have one there now, but would love to add yours too! My site is lookingforpemberley.wordpress.com, and we are not just Austen, but the title was obviously inspired by Miss Austen, and we do have a lot of posts about her work and spinoffs, so I would like to keep directing people to more Austen blogs of high quality :) Let me know what you think!


  14. on February 18, 2012 at 13:09 Thomas de Volpi

    I have just finished watching for the second time this program and I believe that one of the greatest single causes for the demise of ‘The Manor House’ has not been so much as mentioned, death or succesion duties or inheritance taxes. It is apparent to most that at the end of World War I, steps would have to be taken to provide for those who fought but those steps had to be paid for. In some families, where successive heirs, had been killed-or otherwise died- several sets of death duties were then applicable-becoming at some point, punitive-the periods following both world wars signified the abandonment of some of the great houses and their treasures.


  15. on September 23, 2012 at 15:30 Debbie Frearson

    I have a large print that I was given years ago, with three young ladies called “mischief”, printed by J B Kennington. I was watching the programme with the picture of the Jerome sisters and could not believe it when they were the same 3 women in my picture. Unfortunately the only link I can find is to a copy for sale on e-bay, but it is definitely the Jerome’s. http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mischief-J-B-Kennington-/220604951130?pt=Art_Prints&hash=item335d146a5a



Comments are closed.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 7,150 other subscribers
  • Items of Interest

  • Follow Jane Austen's World on WordPress.com
  • Blog Stats

    • 16,753,462 hits
  • RECOMMENDED BOOKS AND RESOURCES

  • Fashionable Goodness: Christianity in Jane Austen's England is now available! By JAW contributor Brenda S. Cox. See Review. Available from Amazon and Jane Austen Books.
  • Praying with Jane: 31 Days through the Prayers of Jane Austen, Rachel Dodge, and a bookmark with the quote "A whole family assembling regulary for the purpose of prayer is fine!" Jane Austen, Mansfield Park
    We also recommend JAW contributor Rachel Dodge's devotionals based on Jane Austen's prayers and classic literature. Reviews:
    Praying With Jane: 31 Days Through the Prayers of Jane Austen;
    The Secret Garden Devotional;
    The Anne of Green Gables Devotional;
    The Little Women Devotional.
  • Book cover of Bath: An Adumbration in Rhyme by John Matthews
    Bath -An Adumbration in Rhyme. Edited by Ben Wiebracht. Read the review of the book at this link. Click to order the book on Amazon US or Amazon UK
  • In Sri Lanka lies the grave of Rear Admiral Charles Austen CB, Jane Austen’s Brother

    The neglected tombstone found in an overgrown burial ground.

    Rear Admiral Charles Austen CB

    Died off Prome, the 7th October 1852, while in command of the Naval Expedition on the river Irrawady against the Burmese Forces, aged 73 years.”

    The grave after restoration

    Read the full article in The Sunday Times. June 27, 2021.

  • The Obituary of Charlotte Collins by Andrew Capes

    Click on image to read the story.

  • Comments

    “My idea of good company…is the company of clever, well-informed people, who have a great deal of conversation.” – Jane Austen, Persuasion

     

    Gentle readers: Please feel free to post your comments and continue the conversation! Due to SPAM, we will no longer accept comments on posts after 30 days of publication. In some instances, links will be removed from comments as well.

  • Administrators and Contributors

    Vic Sanborn, founder of this blog, is supported by a team of talented and knowledgeable writers about Jane Austen and the Regency era. They are:

    • Brenda Cox
    • Rachel Dodge and
    • Tony Grant, who now contributes his photos from London and England

    Click on their names to enter their own blogs.

    In addition, we thank the many experts and authors who frequently contribute their posts and opinions, and who continue to do so freely or at our request.

  • Pin It!

    Follow Me on Pinterest
  • Top Posts

    • The Bathing Dress: Fashion in the Georgian Era
      The Bathing Dress: Fashion in the Georgian Era
    • Social Customs During the Regency
      Social Customs During the Regency
    • Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
      Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
    • Regency Fashion: Men's Breeches, Pantaloons, and Trousers
      Regency Fashion: Men's Breeches, Pantaloons, and Trousers
    • Men's hair styles at the turn of the 19th century
      Men's hair styles at the turn of the 19th century
    • Regency Hygiene: The Bourdaloue
      Regency Hygiene: The Bourdaloue
    • Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable Husband
      Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable Husband
    • The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
      The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
    • Downstairs in Downton Abbey: The Servants
      Downstairs in Downton Abbey: The Servants
    • Dancing at the Netherfield Ball: Pride and Prejudice
      Dancing at the Netherfield Ball: Pride and Prejudice
  • Recent Posts

    • Jane Austen and Rom Coms: Enemies-to-Lovers in Pride and Prejudice
    • Lady Hester Stanhope: Traveler and Trailblazer
    • Jane Austen-Themed Valentines
    • Winter, Regency Style
    • Book Review: Ayesha at Last by Uzma Jalaluddin
  • Links to Jane Austen Blogs

    Click here to enter the page. Topics include Regency fashion, historic foods, Jane Austen societies, British sites, related topics. Click on image.

  • May we suggest?

  • Hello, my name is Vic and I live in Maryland, USA. I have adored Jane Austen almost all of my life. I am a proud lifetime member of the Jane Austen Society of North America. This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me and my team. We do not accept any form of cash advertising, sponsorship, or paid topic insertions. However, we do accept and keep books and CDs to review.

    If you would like to share a new site, or point out an error, please email us. (Yes, we are fallible. We'll own up to our mistakes and will make the corrections with a polite smile on our faces.) Write us at

    gmailbw

    Thank you for visiting this blog. Your comments and suggestions are most welcome.

  • Project Gutenberg: eBook of Stage-coach and Mail in Days of Yore, Volume 2 (of 2), by Charles G. Harper

    STAGE-COACH AND MAIL IN DAYS OF YORE: A PICTURESQUE HISTORY
    OF THE COACHING AGE, VOL. II, By CHARLES G. HARPER. 1903. Click on this link.

     

  • Top Posts & Pages

    • The Bathing Dress: Fashion in the Georgian Era
    • Social Customs During the Regency
    • Highclere Castle Floor Plan: The Real Downton Abbey
    • Regency Fashion: Men's Breeches, Pantaloons, and Trousers
    • Men's hair styles at the turn of the 19th century
    • Regency Hygiene: The Bourdaloue
    • Pride and Prejudice Economics: Or Why a Single Man with a Fortune of £4,000 Per Year is a Desirable Husband
    • The Servant's Quarters in 19th Century Country Houses Like Downton Abbey
    • Downstairs in Downton Abbey: The Servants
    • Dancing at the Netherfield Ball: Pride and Prejudice
  • Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
  • Disclaimer: Our team makes no profit from this blog. We may receive books (physical or digitized) and DVDs for review purposes.

  • Copyright Statement: © Jane Austen's World blog, 2009-2022. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owners is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Jane Austen's World with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Follow Following
    • Jane Austen's World
    • Join 7,150 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Jane Austen's World
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: